Lawyers Maintain an Edge in Rising Billing Rates, Study Finds
Average law firm billing rates are keeping pace with inflation, a report found, but the picture is worse for nonlawyers.
October 04, 2018 at 06:34 PM
3 minute read
Law firm rates across the U.S. are keeping pace with the rise in the cost of living, reaching an average of $245 per hour in 2018.
But billing rates for nonlawyers in firms are stagnant, according to a new study from Clio, a Canadian company that provides cloud-based practice management for firms.
The company used aggregated and anonymized data from nearly 70,000 legal professionals to construct its Billable Hour Index. If law firm rates had grown at the same clip as the Consumer Price Index from 2010 to February 2018, they would now be at $250 per hour.
Lawyers in firms saw their rates slightly surpass the CPI, growing to $267 per hour. But the story for nonlawyers who bill at hourly rates was different. That average rate started at above $150 per hour in 2010, then rose slightly before sinking below $150. Nonlawyers now earn, on average, $143 per hour, a figure that has been essentially stagnant since the middle of 2011.
The Clio report also acknowledged the ubiquity of discounted rates, noting that 36 percent of firms reported always or often discounting rates, while another 38 percent reported doing so sometimes. By far, the most common reason for offering a discount was empathy for clients, according to 71 percent of firms that give breaks on rates. The client's ability to pay was also a consideration, for 59 percent of those firms. And 44 percent of these firms reported offering discounts out of concerns that too much time was tracked.
The order of average billing rates in 10 large metropolitan areas were shuffled since the 2017 report. New York City and Los Angeles remained the two most expensive cities, at $368 per hour and $346, respectively. But Washington, D.C., at $327, leapfrogged both Chicago and Miami to rank third. At $312, Chicago fell from third to fourth. Fifth-place Atlanta, at $305, and sixth-place Dallas, at $302, both passed Miami, which saw rates drop from $310 to $297. Boston, at $288, Houston, at $278, and Philadelphia, at $269, rounded out the list.
The study also broke down the most lucrative practice areas by rates. Firms charged most for intellectual property work, at $317 an hour, followed by bankruptcy at $305, corporate work at $295, mediation and arbitration at $289, and labor and employment at $285.
The order at the top was reversed for lawyers alone, who billed an average of $335 for bankruptcy and $327 for IP.
But much more of the IP work made it onto final invoices, with 86 percent being realized, compared with 74 percent for bankruptcy. The rate of collection was higher too, at 92 percent, compared with 71 percent. This translated into law firms charging an effective rate of $258/hour for IP, compared with $176 for bankruptcy.
As in 2017, the study also found that lawyers were using their time inefficiently, putting an average of only 2.4 hours a day into billable tasks. That's little different from the 2.3 hour average from the previous year.
This is the third year of Clio's Legal Trends Report.
Read More:
What Do Lawyers Really Do With Their Time?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250