Trying to Get Pregnant? Management Would Like to Know.
The co-leader of Jones Day's health care practice at a recent meeting apparently "encouraged" women to tell management if they were pregnant or planning on be. Is that so wrong?
October 08, 2018 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
I am so grateful for white, middle-aged male partners. If it weren't for them, I honestly don't know what I'd write about!
Take Stephen Sozio,the co-leader of Jones Day's health care practice who also chairs the firm's litigation department in Cleveland. At a recent office meeting, he apparently “encouraged” women to tell management if they were pregnant or planning on be, reports Elie Mystal at Above the Law.
Oh, I know all you Blue state, coastal types are getting all up in arms about this. But pipe down. Sozio didn't ask for some nefarious reason. According to Above the Law, Sozio was just inquiring so that management could plan its budget for the upcoming year. You can't blame a guy for fiscal planning.
Besides, I'm not sure he did anything wrong—legally, speaking. From what I can tell, all he did was ask—and nicely, too. He also expressed understanding that women in their first trimester might not want to disclose their pregnancies to him; in that case, he suggested that women contact his administrative assistant instead. (I reached out to Sozio for comment and have yet to hear back.)
“Asking about pregnancy is in itself not illegal, if done in a respectful way,” says employment lawyer Gerald Hathaway, a partner at Drinker Biddle. The tricky part is asking the question appropriately. The woman who's put on the spot might wonder “whether giving that information has some impact on employment decisions being made about her, even when the decision has nothing to do with pregnancy status,” explains Hathaway. “So while not illegal, it is not advisable.”
Not advisable is putting it mildly, says Kamee Verdrager, who sued Mintz Levin for gender discrimination related to her pregnancy in a case that dragged on for several years. (It was settled in December 2016).
“In my opinion, that is definitely an unlawful inquiry,” says Verdrager. “There are several things at play: the imbalance of power, the invasive nature of the question and the potential for evidence to support an inference of discrimination.”
She adds that she tried and won a case for a female client several years ago in Massachusetts in which “the single act of discrimination/retaliation was one conversation where the employer aggressively demanded information about my client's child care plans.” After the pregnant woman refused to provide specifics, but indicated her intention to return to work full time, the employer fired her, citing her “nasty and disrespectful attitude,” says Verdrager.
From a “business perspective,” adds Verdrager, “asking such a question exposes the firm to tremendous liability.” Permit me to be more blunt: It's just stupid to ask female employees about their baby plans.
So how has Jones Day dealt with this little public relations calamity? It issued a statement by Heather Lennox, partner-in-charge of its Cleveland office, that says, in part: “Mr. Sozio's actual remarks were simply to thank all in attendance for their hard work on behalf of Firm clients and to request that, if anyone is presently planning a leave of any kind (including clerkships) next year and would be comfortable sharing the information, it would help the Firm in doing its annual budgeting.”
Nice attempt at spin, but I think it's obvious that Sozio put his foot in his mouth.
These days, most firms are much savvier about how they deal with these issues in the workplace. They know what to tout, like their awesome parental leave policies, flexible working arrangements and how they pay for overnight shipment of breast milk. Most firms would not want to be known as the one that asked women to put their pregnancy plans on the firm calendar.
In any case, I'm not here to slam Sozio. I don't believe he was out to get mommies. He's simply a bit out of it about the dos and don'ts of handling women's issues. Maybe he didn't get the memo about unconscious bias and all the insulting/insensitive/dumb/possibly illegal things male partners shouldn't do or say to women at the workplace.
Remember, just because it's 2018 and #MeToo is the raging topic of our day doesn't mean every guy is “woke.”
So let's be nice to the hapless white guy from Ohio and give him some time to catch up. It's the least we can do.
Read more:
Can New Leave Policies Help Big Law Escape the Parent Trap?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250