Boies Schiller in Spat With Billionaire Over Unpaid Legal Fees
Boies Schiller Flexner withdrew from representing billionaire Alex Shnaider in September, citing irreconcilable differences and unpaid legal bills. Now Shnaider's arguing that the firm is improperly withholding a case file he needs for an upcoming trial.
October 11, 2018 at 05:56 PM
3 minute read
A New York state court is expected to rule Friday on Russian-Canadian billionaire Alex Shnaider's attempt to obtain a client file from Boies Schiller Flexner, which previously represented Shnaider in contract litigation and has asserted a retaining lien over the file because its former client owes the firm legal fees.
Shnaider, now represented by Michael Bowen of Kasowitz Benson Torres, filed a petition on Wednesday, asking a Manhattan state court judge to issue an immediate injunction that would require Boies Schiller to provide a copy of Shnaider's file in a separate lawsuit that has a trial scheduled to begin in December. New York Supreme Court Justice Debra James is expected to hold a hearing on the petition Friday morning.
Kasowitz also represents Shnaider in the underlying contract case, in which the billionaire was accused in Manhattan federal court of breaching agreements with former business partner Eduard Slinin, according to court records in that suit.
Shnaider and Slinin, who bonded over their shared roots as Jewish emigrants from the former Soviet Union, teamed up, starting in the mid-2000s, on a plan to buy several private jets from Bombardier Inc. The idea was to use Shnaider's business connections to buy Learjets and other planes, and then “flip” them for a profit by selling the aircraft to Slinin's contacts, many of whom were Russian or Ukrainian businesspeople, according to court records. The business partnership later soured, however, and Slinin sued in 2015.
(Separate from the jet case, Shnaider's reported links to Russia have landed him in the news recently, specifically related to his past business partnership with President Donald Trump, whose company licensed the Trump brand for use on a skyscraper that Shnaider developed in Toronto.)
In early September, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan, who is overseeing the jet case, granted the firm's motion to withdraw from representing Shnaider. The ruling came just days after Boies Schiller's Karen Dyer sent a letter asking to withdraw as defense counsel “due to irreconcilable differences with Mr. Shnaider regarding the payment of BSF's legal fees.”
Before that, Boies Schiller served as Shnaider's defense counsel in the jet case from February 2016 until the representation ended in early September. During their time representing him, the firm helped Shnaider narrow the case, convincing Sullivan to dismiss claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. That left Slinin with a single claim for an accounting on dissolution of his partnership with Shnaider.
In the state court petition, Shnaider alleges that Boies Schiller asserted a retaining lien on his case file in the jet case because of the dispute over unpaid legal fees. Regardless of who's right in the legal fee dispute, Shnaider argued, Boies Schiller should still have to provide at least the portion of the client file that contains discovery related to the jet case, in light of the upcoming trial.
“Irrespective of the merits of any claim BSF may have to unpaid legal fees, withholding discovery on the eve of trial will grievously harm BSF's own former client,” Shnaider's lawyers at Kasowitz wrote in the state court petition.
As of Thursday afternoon, Boies Schiller hadn't submitted any state court filings in response to Shnaider's petition, and representatives for the firm declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250