Drinker Biddle Settles Racial Discrimination Lawsuit in Princeton
A stipulation of dismissal with prejudice states that a confidential settlement agreement was reached that includes a release of the plaintiff's claims.
October 23, 2018 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Drinker Biddle & Reath has settled a racial discrimination lawsuit filed by a black legal assistant in its Princeton, New Jersey, office, who claimed she was paid less than colleagues because of her race and was subject to racially insensitive comments.
Syneetra Hill sued Drinker Biddle on July 26 in Mercer County Superior Court, and the case was dismissed pursuant to a confidential settlement on Sept. 27. Hill's lawyer, Allan Schorr, said he is unable to discuss the terms other than to say “the matter is resolved,” and his client is no longer working at Drinker Biddle. But he added that his client is pleased with the outcome.
“It was an important case and I'm glad it was resolved,” said Schoor, of Schoor & Associates in Cherry Hill.
Drinker Biddle said in a statement, “We are pleased to have resolved this matter.”
A stipulation of dismissal with prejudice states that Hill, Drinker Biddle and attorney Marsha Beidler, who was also named as a defendant, have entered into a confidential settlement agreement that includes a release of the plaintiff's claims. The court retained jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing provisions of the settlement.
Hill's suit claimed that Drinker Biddle's Princeton office maintains a corporate culture that is hostile to African-Americans. She said that a former supervisor of hers, who was not identified, kept Confederate memorabilia in his office at the law firm. Later, she was assigned to work with Beidler, an attorney who is of counsel and practices trust and estate law. The complaint alleges that Beidler created a racially hostile environment with her offensive comments.
The suit said Beidler once referred to Hill as “our slave” in the presence of a client, who appeared shocked to hear the remark. Beidler tried to correct herself by saying that Hill works like a slave, the suit claims.
In another instance, Beidler allegedly told Hill that segregation was “good for blacks because at least they could go to their own colleges.” Beidler, according to the suit, also expressed surprise to learn Hill was vacationing at Martha's Vineyard, even though many black families have long vacationed there.
And in another alleged instance, on seeing a picture of Hill's 1-year-old son, Beidler said “he should be ready to get a basketball in his hands,” the lawsuit said.
Hill said she complained about Beidler to management, and was told that the firm corroborated her complaints but concluded that Beidler did not mean to offend her. The suit also said she received a memo from the firm, in May 2017, stating that Beidler would undergo sensitivity training. But Beidler never had any sensitivity training, Hill claimed.
Hill was moved to another location in the office and assigned to a different attorney after complaining about Beidler. After that, Beidler regularly walked across the office to use a copier near Hill's desk, even though another copier is closer to Beidler's office, according to the lawsuit. While doing so, Beidler loudly slammed books and made noises to annoy and harass the plaintiff, the lawsuit claimed.
Hill also claimed she received smaller raises and bonuses since she brought her discrimination complaint to management.
Hill was an 11-year veteran of Drinker Biddle's Princeton office. She said in court papers that the firm celebrates diversity on its website, but no black attorneys ever worked in the Princeton office during the time she was there. She and a mailroom worker were the only black employees out of 45 people working there, she said. The firm's website lists 28 lawyers at the Princeton office.
Thomas Barton, an attorney who signed the settlement on behalf of Drinker Biddle, and Jonathan Epstein, the partner in charge of the Princeton office, did not return calls for comment. Beidler also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
5 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Trending Stories
- 1Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 2Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 3Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 4Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 5Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250