The Deep Value of Law Firm Alignment
Only when each part of a firm is working toward the same business goals can it truly flourish.
October 23, 2018 at 12:41 PM
6 minute read
When it comes to law firm performance, does alignment matter? The answer is an emphatic yes. In our collective 65 years entrenched in law firms, we've seen well-aligned firms soar and succeed while poorly aligned firms have foundered and failed. But what exactly do we mean by alignment and why is it important?
There are law firms where everything is in sync. Like the vertebrae in a well-formed spine, elements of the business seem aligned. Members of the firm's leadership team have collaborated to create a very clear business strategy and they've communicated that vision throughout the partnership and associate and administrative ranks. The partnership has worked together to support the strategy through a host of appropriate tactics: developing new practice areas, forming a firmwide compensation system in support of a mission, and fostering a culture allowing them to retain and develop top professionals and talented staff. For partners, they've put into place both extrinsic (compensation) and intrinsic (peer approval) rewards to reinforce those behaviors the firm prizes. These firms have agreed on a purpose and have established a plan for healthy growth.
Then there are firms that have no alignment. Management may once have developed a detailed strategy to achieve growth, but never got around to communicating the strategy to associates or support staff. They continue to fund programs that fall outside of the strategy and delay making changes to their compensation structure to support the new goals, because, as they say, it's “just too much to handle right now.” The firm's leadership prefers not to bring their C-suite executives into the picture, except on a need-to-know basis.
Alignment is more than an orthopedic objective or a marketing buzzword. Alignment is an essential principle for a law firm's survival.
In past years, alignment may not have been a requisite for success. In fact, a certain amount of misalignment was accepted.
In the pre-2008 years, significant annual demand growth of almost 4 percent and rate increases enabled most firms to achieve double-digit revenue growth without breaking much of a sweat. These seemingly healthy dynamics actually masked underlying problems at many firms. These firms succeeded despite misalignment. In the new world order where law firm clients have many more options, firms simply cannot afford the luxury of misalignment. In this tepid demand growth environment where rate increases have been less than half the levels enjoyed during the earlier period, there will be winners and losers. And we believe alignment is the key differentiator.
Research demonstrates that there is a strong correlation between an organization's success and the amount of focus it places on organizational health. Focusing on health involves managing alignment based on creating a common vision, providing tactics to execute on that vision, and constantly innovating to bring new ideas and improvement to the organization.
According to McKinsey & Co., organizations that work on these aspects not only achieve long-term measurable improvements in their organizational well-being, but by starting to focus on alignment, companies demonstrate tangible performance gains in as little as six to 12 months. In Deborah's work interviewing more than 55 professionals for her book “Best Practices for Law Firm Business Development and Marketing,” she found that those law firms with leaders who could easily talk about how the various elements of vision, culture and compensation worked together were more likely to lead firms that were profitable and had a better outlook for a long-term future.
McKinsey's research for its Organizational Health Index shows a strong correlation between a firm's culture and its performance. Firms that align their compensation and other recognition methods with their key goals and objectives, demonstrate a high degree of transparency and reinforce their vision with communications are more likely to demonstrate success than those that are merely average.
Alignment applies to large, multi-practice firms and small firms alike. How does a firm's management begin to put alignment into place? Some ways to begin include:
- Operational and marketing tactics should all be based on a well-defined and articulated strategy.
- Strategy must be communicated, up and down the organization. Sharing strategy both with direct reports and throughout the organization leads to greater loyalty, a shared sense of purpose, and collaboration. The time spent communicating these decisions is an investment that pays off in multiples.
- C-suite members should have a role on the executive committee to provide input in the development of the firm's strategy and vision. Not only will C-suite involvement build loyalty, these executives will be allies in plan implementation.
- Compensation metrics should be transparent and reward those behaviors that a firm values. Consider rewarding not just for business development activity, but where there is collaboration across all practice areas.
- During compensation time, look at qualitative metics for more than simply self-reporting. Consider asking partners not only to self-report, but to answer assessment questions, such as: “Over the past year, which partner outside of your practice, helped you build your practice the most?” Third-party recognition will give a more robust picture.
- Leaders of the firm, practice areas and committees should be those who emulate the values of the firm and further its strategic mission. Bad behavior that goes against firm policies and standards puts the firm at risk, erodes culture and communicates a message that the mission is not a serious one.
Firms can no longer afford to think that aspects of a business are purely tactical. There is too much at stake. Costs are high and competition is intense. Every tactic needs to branch out from a carefully defined core strategy. Culture and strategy need to be aligned and to reach all of the bones of an organization. Getting alignment right leads to superior performance; getting it wrong leads to places better not to contemplate.
Deborah Farone is a strategy consultant at Farone Advisors and author of “Best Practices in Law Firm Marketing and Business Development.” Dan DiPietro is principal at Dan DiPietro Consulting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250