This Ropes & Gray Leader Is Running for NY Attorney General. Who Knew?
Why does Keith Wofford, on leave from Ropes & Gray where he's served as co-head of its New York office, want to enter a political race that he's almost sure to lose?
October 23, 2018 at 04:37 PM
6 minute read
It's only two weeks away from the New York attorney general election, arguably the most powerful AG position in the country at this moment, and the headquarters of the Republican candidate is eerily quiet. When I arrived at its Midtown post in New York, there was no receptionist, no ringing phones, no loud voices (actually, no voices)—none of the hub-hub that you'd expect from campaign central. In fact, I had to poke into a couple of near-empty rooms to announce my appointment with Keith Wofford, the GOP candidate.
Until he decided to run for the AG post, Wofford was co-head of Ropes & Gray's 300-plus-lawyer New York office. A bankruptcy and creditors' rights lawyer, Wofford is now on leave from the firm.
By most accounts, Wofford is expected to lose to Letitia James, his Democratic opponent, the New York City public advocate and protégé of Gov. Andrew Cuomo. (In an Oct. 1 Siena College poll, James leads Wofford, 50 percent to 36 percent.) For starters, Wofford has little name recognition—anywhere. Even in the rarefied circles of Big Law, where he's one of the few black partners, he seems to have kept a low profile.
Plus, it's unlikely to help him with minority voters that he's a black Trump supporter. (According to the New York Times, Wofford is “the only statewide Republican candidate who would admit to voting for President Trump,” adding that he's also donated to Democrats.)
So who is Wofford? Why is he running for attorney general of New York? And what does he think of the issues of the day—like Trump's tax investigation and affirmative action. Below is an edited version of our conversation:
You're the co-head of a major office of a major firm. You're making buckets of money [Wofford reported earning between $4.35 million and $4.45 million in 2017 on his disclosure form]. Why do you need to run for AG? Are you bored with practice? No, not bored! I love practicing law and the firm. I'm running because it's important for someone to come from the outside. That's the only way to deal with the corruption in Albany and locally. We've seen three attorney generals in a row who talked about corruption and did nothing. There was [Eliot] Spitzer, who resigned in disgrace, [Andrew] Cuomo, who disbanded the commission looking into corruption, and [Eric] Schneiderman, who also resigned in disgrace. There's a crisis of confidence, and we need someone who's not part of the political machine.
I get that we need an outsider to fight corruption. But aren't Democrats and Republicans both part of the culture of corruption in New York? I'm going after everyone. I'm an independent person. This is not a partisan crusade.
But why did you choose to align with the GOP? I mean, it must be lonely being a black Republican in New York. I don't look at this from a numbers or popularity perspective. I look at it from the perspective of ideas. One of the biggest problems is our public school system. The Democrats have failed students, especially students of color. If the Democrats had their way, there'd be no charter schools, and we need to give parents that choice.
So you became a Republican because of education, and you think that Republicans are doing a better job at education. OK. Whatever. But let's get back to the attorney general job. The current acting AG Barbara Underwood is looking into Trump's family foundation and taxes. Are those things that you'd continue under your watch? That's a good question. Look, no one is above the law. And given the magnitude of what's come out about the tax investigation by the New York Times, it merits scrutiny. But you don't ramp up or down the charges based on whether you agree or disagree with someone. You soil the credibility of the office of the AG if you do that.
So you haven't given any kind of pledge to Donald Trump about the investigations? No pledges of loyalty.
Let's talk about your career. You came from a very modest background, growing up in Buffalo, where your father was a factory worker. You then went Harvard at age 17, then Harvard Law School. How did you beat the odds? I didn't listen to anyone who said I couldn't do it. My parents never set artificial limits on us. I also got help from leaders in Buffalo, the African-American community and the business community there. There were a couple of breaks here and there that made a difference.
You seem to have had a smooth career. You've worked at the most elite firms—first, Wachtell Lipton and now Ropes & Gray. Did you experience racism along the way? Of course. It's out there, but the question is how you deal with it. You have to be level-headed and not let it distract you from your goals. Sometimes you don't know why someone says something or does something that seems offensive. Maybe it was racism, maybe not. You can't let it create a mental block.
Why aren't there more minorities who are equity partners in Big Law? It's a pipeline issue—not enough people coming through the system. Then, firms are not good at integrating people into the firm's social network. There are lots of factors as to who gets the best assignments.
You're a conservative, so what do you think of the current litigation against Harvard that's challenging race as a factor in admission? I wish people would not look to litigation as a solution in these matters. I haven't looked at the evidence about the case. But I have a lot of gratitude towards Harvard because they did so much for me. I really can't criticize Harvard.
Do you think you've benefited from affirmative action in your life? Probably.
Any words of advice for young people of color who'd like to follow your path? Work hard and don't be afraid to be bad at something. And don't let people put limitations on you.
And what happens if the AG thing doesn't work out? I'll be very happy to go back to practicing law.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250