This scenario might sound familiar to many in the law firm world: A client reaches out late in the afternoon, maybe even on a Friday, asking for a piece of work product to be turned around by the close of business. That then sets off a cascade of action and stress inside a law firm, as partners put other work on hold and pull in associates to assist, all in the name of excellent client service.
But how often are those types of requests true emergencies? And when they're not, do they put undue pressure on the lawyers tasked with that work, who already have busy schedules?
Since stress and burnout contribute to mental health and substance abuse problems—which are already more prevalent in the legal profession than the general population—intense client demands can make matters worse, according to several experts focused on lawyer mental health.
“The biggest area where we, as in-house counsel, can help with outside counsel in that respect is making sure that not everything is a fire drill,” said Bobbi-Sue Doyle-Hazard, an assistant general counsel with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers football team and a mental health advocate. “If there's the FBI at your door, then, yeah, that's an emergency.”
But more often than not, that's not the case. And In-house legal teams could be more cognizant of how their demands impact their outside lawyers, said Doyle-Hazard, who emphasized that she was commenting personally and not on behalf of her organization.
Client demands and meeting their expectations are a “huge part” of where the extreme and chronic stresses in law firms come from, said Patrick Krill of Krill Strategies, a consulting firm that advises law firms on well-being among lawyers. “Then they become amplified once they get into the firm—they want to exceed client expectations.”
He continued, “If you have the demand from the client being, perhaps, a bit unreasonable, and then they're amplified by the firm, you can see where things become unmanageable.”
Outside his normal consulting work, Krill recently spearheaded a survey that asked managing partners and human resources staff at Am Law 200 firms a number of questions about mental health. The survey, conducted alongside ALM Intelligence, found that the vast majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that depression, anxiety and alcohol abuse occur within their firms. When asked the causes of mental health and substance issues, nearly 80 percent of those surveyed ranked “stress and workload” as the top cause.
Beyond statistics, these types of findings are sometimes painfully borne out as real-life examples.
The past few years, for instance, have seen several reports of suicides among lawyers at large firms. Earlier in October, a Sidley Austin partner in Los Angeles died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, while before that, a DLA Piper partner in Boston took his own life in August.
Meanwhile, Baker McKenzie revealed on Monday that the London-based global chair of the firm, Paul Rawlinson, would take a temporary leave of absence for health issues “caused by exhaustion.”
One common source of tension contributing to the problem stems from a lack of communication about scheduling and deadlines between clients and their outside law firms, said Doyle-Hazard, at the Buccaneers.
“Everybody has multiple competing demands. The person asking you to do something doesn't know about your competing demands,” she said, adding that those rival demands are common when working in a service industry, such as the legal sector. “You have a lot coming at you at once, and each of those different avenues of data flow don't know about each other.”
Clients can tamp down the stress levels by plotting out their own time better and setting realistic deadlines based on true necessity, Doyle-Hazard said. She also suggested an approach that might help when an edict comes down from above—situations when, on the in-house side, a demand may pass from an executive to the legal department, or at a law firm, when a partner passes pressing work onto a more junior lawyer. In those instances, she said, lawyers often don't do a great job of “managing up,” meaning they don't ask enough questions of superiors about when a given task truly has to be completed.
Will Meyerhofer, a former Sullivan & Cromwell associate who's now a full-time therapist, agreed that time demands are a common source of stress for lawyers. But, in his view, those kinds of pressures are more likely to play out within law firms. He said it's not typically a client who is, say, calling after midnight. It's more likely that a senior partner might beckon a more junior lawyer to complete the late-night task.
“It's probably not the client driving you crazy. It's probably the partner that's driving you crazy,” said Meyerhofer, whose therapy practice specializes in counseling lawyers. “The partners don't really care about an associate's life—they could give a hoot.”
Still, Meyerhofer said, clients play other roles in contributing to stress and mental health issues among their outside counsel. With regard to client interactions, lawyers at firms often have a hard time dealing with expectations of perfection. Another source of stress can come if clients urge a lawyer to be ultra-aggressive, even when that approach might not come naturally or might actually undermine the client's position in some way.
“It puts you in the position of doing something that's not really in anyone's interest and making you be someone you don't want to be,” Meyerhofer said. “I get a lot of, 'The son of a gun wants to be really aggressive and I think it's a big mistake. He's not following my advice.'”
Against the backdrop of stress and its contribution to depression, anxiety and substance abuse among lawyers, law firms and their clients can keep those issues in mind when setting expectations or handing down deadlines, said Krill, the law firm behavioral health consultant.
“The first step is both for the clients and the firms to step back and look at the landscape and acknowledge that there is a significant amount of mental health distress, substance abuse and lack of well-being in the legal profession,” Krill said. He notes that the legal industry as a whole has taken recent steps toward that kind of recognition—as one example, the American Bar Association this year unveiled a pledge campaign that calls on legal employers to recognize mental health problems in the profession and take steps to address them. As of Wednesday, 25 large law firms have signed onto the pledge.
Beyond acknowledging the mental health struggles facing the legal industry, firms and clients should also consider the practical risks of pushing lawyers too hard, Krill said.
For law firms, that might mean remembering a mantra they often espouse internally—that the people who make up the firm are their “most valuable assets.” If someone is run down from stress, mental health struggles or substance abuse, it's more likely that person will have to take some sort of break, causing disruption on a client matter or within a practice area. For clients, Krill added, the risks involve the potential that the quality of work done by an outside firm suffers.
Krill said, “Clients need to think about, 'What are the risks, what are the downsides, of running our firms at 120 percent all of the time?'”
Read More:
How Clients Contribute to Mental Health Problems at Law Firms
One Big Law Attorney's Journey with Depression, One Firm's Response to the Profession's Problem
Big Law Leaders Say Stress Is Main Cause of Addiction and Mental Health Problems
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250