After Selling Business, Lathrop Gage Partner Charts New Path
The firm has hired Robert Haupt, a lawyer with an entrepreneurial bent returning to private practice after several years running the largest consumer law shop in the country.
October 26, 2018 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
Lathrop Gage, fresh off bolstering its revitalized office in Los Angeles, has hired Robert Haupt as a partner in its headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri.
Haupt, who will be a member of the Am Law 200 firm's bankruptcy, restructuring and creditors' rights team, has a somewhat unusual legal background. He comes to Lathrop Gage after selling his stake in one of the largest consumer law firms in the country.
A former real estate executive, Haupt went to law school in his mid-30s following a divorce, he said in an interview this week. Haupt used his previous business expertise to develop a bankruptcy and litigation practice in Oklahoma City, where in 2008 he joined Phillips Murrah, one of the city's largest firms.
“I've always wanted to take my practical business experience and translate it to clients to help them solve their problems and other issues,” said Haupt, who in private practice primarily advises midsize, closely held companies in distressed situations. “I'm like an estate planning lawyer, but for businesses. What happens if your business gets this disease and dies?”
At Phillips Murrah, Haupt helped the firm forge a partnership with another Oklahoma City-based shop in 2011. He left the combined outfit and his restructuring-oriented practice three years later to pursue an entrepreneurial endeavor. Prior to joining Lathrop Gage, Haupt served as a managing member and co-founder of the National Litigation Law Group (NLLG), which calls itself the largest consumer law firm in the country.
The NLLG, which grew rapidly in recent years from its base in Oklahoma City, specializes in low-cost, high-volume representation of clients with medical and consumer debt. The NLLG grew from five employees to more than 200 during Haupt's tenure. He formed the business in 2014 with fellow Oklahoma lawyer James Bryant before selling his stake last year to a group led by W. Lance Conn, an attorney and former president of Vulcan Capital, the investment arm of late Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen. (Bryant, now of counsel at Spencer Fane in Dallas and Kansas City, is still listed as a co-managing member of NLLG.)
Haupt said his experience at NLLG, which secured a contract with a national debt settlement company and backing from Silicon Valley, helped him appreciate the increased importance of technology in delivering legal services. He credited Lathrop Gage managing partner Cameron Garrison, who assumed leadership of the firm a year ago, with “enthusiastically embracing” technology to provide more cost-effective services to clients.
In August, Garrison reiterated Lathrop Gage's commitment to its Midwest roots following the closure of a small office in Springfield, Missouri. That move came shortly after the firm bolted on a four-lawyer boutique to expand its office in Los Angeles. Lathrop Gage then added a pair of intellectual property partners—Erica Van Loon and Andrew Choung—in the city in September.
While Lathrop Gage has no immediate plans to open an office in Oklahoma City, Haupt acknowledged some initial discussions about doing so. After the sale of his stake in NLLJ, Haupt set up his own firm in Oklahoma City before looking for a national platform that could best provide the flexibility he needed to rebuild his commercial law practice. (Haupt declined to discuss specific clients, noting they mostly want to remain anonymous given the difficult situations they're in as they seek to avoid bankruptcy court.)
Haupt and his wife moved to Kansas City for “personal, family reasons,” he said, and having now relocated fulltime to Lathrop Gage's hometown, he's looking forward to integrating his practice with the roughly 230-lawyer firm.
“You can tell a lot about an organization by the way it treats its people and about a law firm by the way it treats its nonlegal support staff,” Haupt said about Lathrop Gage, which last year became the latest large firm to drop the ampersand from its name. “They have a commitment here to technology and process flow, as well as transparency and the next wave of growth and development.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Former Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250