Billionaire Ex-Client Can Retrieve File From Boies Schiller But Must Put Up $860K
Billionaire Alex Shnaider will be able to collect a client file from his former lawyers at Boies Schiller, but—for now, at least—it'll cost him.
October 31, 2018 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
|
Canadian billionaire Alex Shnaider can have a client file held by his former lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner, but he'll first have to pony up $860,000 and place it in escrow because of an ongoing unpaid legal fees dispute, a New York judge has ruled.
In a decision dated Tuesday, Manhattan-based state Supreme Court Judge Debra James ordered Boies Schiller to hand over a client file to Shnaider, who the firm previously represented in a federal court dispute with a former business partner in a venture to sell private jets. But she also said Shnaider must put $860,000 into an escrow account in light of Boies Schiller's claim that it's owed roughly that much in legal fees from its time representing the businessman.
The state judge's decision stems from a dispute that came before her earlier in October, when Shnaider, now represented by Kasowitz Benson Torres, filed a state court petition seeking the return of his client file. Boies Schiller had previously represented Shnaider as he pursued the jet lawsuit in federal court, but after about two years, a federal judge allowed the firm to withdraw from the case amid an irreconcilable dispute over legal fees.
With a trial scheduled in the jet case for early December, Shnaider's lawyers at Kasowitz argued that the billionaire wouldn't be able to adequately mount a defense without the client file from Boies Schiller, which contains discovery material from the jet litigation.
Boies Schiller, on the other hand, asserted a retaining lien on the client file and argued that otherwise, it would lose its leverage to recover the money that it believes Shnaider owes. Boies Schiller has said in court filings that Shnaider owes a little less than $870,000 plus interest, bringing the total to near $1 million.
James' ruling on Tuesday falls in line with a compromise that Boies Schiller proposed a few weeks ago. At an Oct. 12 hearing, Boies Schiller partner Nicholas Gravante Jr. indicated the firm would be willing to return the client file as long as Shnaider agreed to put money in escrow until the fee dispute could be formally resolved.
A lawyer representing Shnaider at that hearing declined to accept that offer, however, leaving James to hold another hearing on Monday and, ultimately, issue her ruling. If the two sides fail to resolve the fee dispute, the judge will hold an additional hearing in mid-April, according to her ruling.
Karen Chesley, a Boies Schiller partner who has represented the firm in the fee dispute, said she views James' decision as a favorable one because it protects the firm's ability to seek payment for the legal work it performed on Shnaider's behalf. The firm never intended to restrict Shnaider's ability to defend himself in the federal jet litigation as long as Boies Schiller could also protect its rights, she added.
“We are very pleased that Judge James recognized the well-established rule in New York that a client is not entitled to his legal files unless he provides security for his unpaid fees,” Chesley said.
A Kasowitz partner who is representing Shnaider, Michael Bowen, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
1 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 2Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 3Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 4Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 5Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250