Dickinson Wright Absorbs Boutique as IP Hiring Stays Hot
A group of lawyers, previously of the boutique Mayback & Hoffman, join Dickinson Wright amid what has been an active stretch of large law firms bulking up their IP practices.
November 08, 2018 at 04:26 PM
4 minute read
Bringing on five intellectual property lawyers from a Fort Lauderdale and Silicon Valley-based boutique, Dickinson Wright has spurred on an already-lively hiring market for IP lawyers among Am Law 200 firms.
Michigan-based Dickinson Wright has announced that it would effectively absorb the small firm, Mayback & Hoffman, as it hired the boutique's two name partners—Catherine Hoffman and Gregory Mayback—and three other lawyers in Florida and Silicon Valley. Hoffman and Mayback join Dickinson Wright as members based in Ft. Lauderdale, where their colleagues James Stepan and Julie Dahlgard will serve in of counsel roles. The fifth former Mayback & Hoffman lawyer, Rebecca Tie, joins Dickinson Wright's Silicon Valley outpost as of counsel.
“Catherine Hoffman and Greg Mayback along with their team bring preeminent qualifications to Dickinson Wright, immediately strengthening our intellectual property practice,” Philip Rettig, the division director for IP at Dickinson Wright, said on Thursday.
The new lawyers come to Dickinson Wright amid what has been an active stretch of large law firms bulking up their IP practices. For its part, the Michigan-based firm—which is expected to undergo a leadership change early next year that could lead to continued lateral recruiting—had already hired five IP lawyers since June. Those hires are in addition to the five brought on board with the just-announced acquisition of Mayback & Hoffman.
And all of these hires came on top of the firm's move in April to open a Silicon Valley office with a six-person team formerly of Downey Brand. That team, led by member Michael Ferrazano, included four lawyers and two senior patent agents.
Rettig said Dickinson Wright has nearly doubled its IP department since 2015, bringing 38 lawyers and patent agents on board. The expansion, he said, stems from a desire to serve clients with a growing need for IP protection.
“We feel with emerging technology and an ever-increasing entrepreneurial climate, where it's never been more important to protect our clients' intellectual property and trade secrets, that bringing in lawyers with expertise in copyrights, trademarks, patents and litigation will help to broaden our offerings to more effectively serve our clients across the U.S. and in Canada,” he said.
A similar pattern of hiring in IP has also taken hold at other Am Law 200 firms. Cozen O'Connor, for instance, announced earlier this week that it had added Vadim Braginsky, a former electrical engineer, as an IP-focused counsel in the firm's Minneapolis office.
That hire, though, was only one of seven recent additions that Cozen has made to its IP practice in the past four months. Starting in July, the firm has added franchise law expert Susan Grueneberg in Los Angeles; Frank Abramonte, Lorraine Linford and Jeremy Dukmen in Seattle; IP trial lawyer Thomas Fisher in Washington, D.C.; and patent prosecutor Carl Wischhusen in New York. All of those lawyers joined Cozen as members of the IP practice, the firm's equivalent of a partner.
Cozen's Camille Miller, co-chair of the firm's IP department, said on Thursday that intellectual property needs are common among all businesses and as such “it is always a good time to add IP.” She added that Cozen has recently brought on lawyers from boutiques who bring with them strong client relationships. Those relationships, said Miller, are a boon to the firm, but the incoming lawyers can also strengthen those ties by joining forces with a larger team.
“We are benefiting from the recent wave of IP lawyers in smaller boutiques with deep client relationships looking to move to established nationally branded firms like Cozen O'Connor, where all their clients' legal needs can be handled under one roof,” she said. “The move to a large full-service firm strengthens the IP lawyer's relationship with the client, gives the client access to large firm resources and contacts, and introduces new clients to the firm. It has been a total win for us.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250