About a Third of Legal Departments Hire Smaller, Cheaper Firms, Altman Weil Survey Says
The 19th Annual Chief Legal Officer Survey by Altman Weil Inc. on management, staffing and spending trends in law departments finds many law departments are negotiating discounts with larger firms or moving work to smaller firms and staffing up their own law departments.
November 12, 2018 at 02:06 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
When legal departments are looking to hire outside law firms, cost is key, and bigger isn't always better, according to a new survey that shows roughly a third of chief legal officers are shifting outside legal work to smaller firms with lower rates.
This year, 31 percent of CLOs reported that they'd moved outside work to firms with lower billing rates while also noting that they are “successfully using smaller law firms that offer quality work and service at considerable reductions in cost,” according to Altman Weil Inc.'s 2018 Chief Legal Officer Survey. That finding is similar to last year's study, which showed that 33 percent of CLOs had shifted outside work to lower-priced firms.
“An overall sense is a lot of firms [legal departments] are feeling that they can't hammer down rates on the big firms. And they don't like contract lawyers, and they're not going to alternative service providers. So what do they do? Shift to lower-cost firms,” said Rees Morrison, a principal of Altman Weil who co-authored the study.
The management consulting services firm based its 19th annual survey results on responses from 279 law departments that are primarily in the manufacturing, technology, insurance and retail industries. More than 40 percent of the respondents reported between $1 billion and $5 billion in revenue for Fiscal Year 2017.
The survey showed that many law departments are negotiating discounts with outside counsel. In fact, 62 percent of law departments said they'd successfully negotiated for reduced fees with the median discount being about 10 percent off regular hourly rates. But there's a point at which the haggling hits a wall: 55 percent of the CLOs said outside firms push back when asked for bigger discounts.
“Larger law departments are most likely to receive discounts—but they are also most likely to face resistance from outside counsel,” states the survey. “This may be because large departments are often working with the largest and most sophisticated law firms, the segment of the market where demand is most likely to outstrip supply.”
The survey also found that 47 percent of law departments are now sending some of the work that they once gave to law firms to outside vendors that aren't law firms. Litigation discovery, including electronic discovery, and document review are the most common types of work that get outsourced to vendors. The finding falls in line with a trend toward unbundling legal services, according to Altman Weil.
|Law departments are hiring, budgets expanding
While law departments are angling for better deals when they have to look outside, they're also continuing to grow in response to increased workloads: 42 percent of the respondents said they planned to hire more in-house lawyers in the next year—and only 7.5 percent planned to cut staff.
“This degree of growth—in which four or five times as many departments plan increases over decreases—is part of a long-term trend the survey has tracked since 2010,” the survey states.
As legal departments expand, so does their budgets. More than half of the law departments in the survey reported spending increases from 2017 to 2018, while only 29 percent said they'd tightened the purse strings and spent less during the same time.
And for the first time since 2011, the survey showed that, despite the push for lower rates and the shift to smaller firms, more law departments had spent more on outside counsel over the past year than those that had cut back: 42 percent compared with 32 percent, respectively.
Looking ahead, more than 40 percent of the CLOs expected that they'd spend more on outside counsel in 2019, while only 29 percent thought they'd spend less.
|Other findings:
- When asked what their bosses value most in a law department's performance, aside from solving legal problems, more than 80 percent of the CLOs said controlling legal spending was top priority, followed by managing compliance issues.
- More than 66 percent of CLOs said they'd turned to technology, primarily portal software and e-billing, in an effort to improve their law department's efficiency in delivering legal services. Meanwhile, about 44 percent reported that they were relying more on paralegals and other paraprofessionals.
- Law firms might want to consider providing their legal department clients with data analytics on outside counsel spending. When asked if they were getting useful data on spending from their go-to outside firms, more than 72 percent of CLOs said they were not.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
1 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
- 2Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 3The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 4Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250