Demand for Big Law Hits Post-Recession High: Report
2018 is shaping up to be a banner year for Big Law financials.
November 12, 2018 at 05:50 AM
4 minute read
Here's some good news for your upcoming holiday parties: Demand at large law firms grew more in the third quarter of 2018 than any three-month period since 2011, according to the Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Index.
So far this year, demand has risen 0.9 percent, which may sound miniscule but represents the strongest performance since 2014. Demand had fallen through three quarters in each of the past two years—down 0.6 percent last year and down 0.3 percent in 2016, Thomson Reuters said.
The report is in line with other surveys this year that have said 2018 is shaping up to be one of the strongest post-recession years for law firm financials. Citi Private Bank said in August that the first half of the year saw the industry grow revenue by 5.5 percent, which was the most since 2007.
Most reports, including the Thomson Reuters survey, point to a booming economy, tax reform and a busy M&A market as reasons for the strong law firm market.
That strong market appears to be increasingly benefiting firms of all sizes. While most of the industry's demand growth has come in recent years from the highest end of the market, the Am Law 100, the Thomson Reuters report says demand lifted for firms of all sizes last quarter. That marks the first time since 2015 that Am Law 100, Second Hundred and midsize firms all experienced demand growth in the same quarter.
Still, Am Law 100 firms are outpacing their peers. With 3.8 percent growth in billable hours in the third quarter, demand for the 100 largest firms by revenue is now up 2.5 percent on the year. Am Law Second Hundred firms saw demand grow 1.9 percent in the third quarter to bring their yearly growth to 0.5 percent. Demand for midsize firms' time rose 0.5 percent in the third quarter and is now up 0.4 percent year-to-date.
Demand was not the only bright spot: Rates and productivity also saw gains, bringing a Thomson Reuters-developed composite score for the health of the legal market up to a 63 out of 100, from 62. It marked the first time that score has risen in consecutive quarters since early 2015.
On the rates front, average worked rates—a figure of what lawyers charge on their bills—rose 3.1 percent in the third quarter to bring the yearly growth to 3.3 percent compared with this time last year. It was the fifth consecutive quarter of worked-rate growth of 3 percent or higher.
Worked-rate growth was also more evenly dispersed among firms. All segments (Am Law 100, Second Hundred and midsize firms) saw increases of at least 3 percent.
Realization rates against those rates—the percentage of a worked rate that a firm collects—also rose in the third quarter to 89.4 percent. That is a slight improvement over last year, but has yet to recover from post-recession highs.
Productivity rose 1.3 percent in the third quarter as a result of improved demand and restrained head count growth, Thomson Reuters said. Head count for the Am Law 100 is up 1.6 percent year-to-date after growing by 2.1 percent in the third quarter. Am Law Second Hundred and midsize firms have seen head count grow by 0.5 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively, for the year.
More Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Eckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250