Demand for Big Law Hits Post-Recession High: Report
2018 is shaping up to be a banner year for Big Law financials.
November 12, 2018 at 05:50 AM
4 minute read
Here's some good news for your upcoming holiday parties: Demand at large law firms grew more in the third quarter of 2018 than any three-month period since 2011, according to the Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Index.
So far this year, demand has risen 0.9 percent, which may sound miniscule but represents the strongest performance since 2014. Demand had fallen through three quarters in each of the past two years—down 0.6 percent last year and down 0.3 percent in 2016, Thomson Reuters said.
The report is in line with other surveys this year that have said 2018 is shaping up to be one of the strongest post-recession years for law firm financials. Citi Private Bank said in August that the first half of the year saw the industry grow revenue by 5.5 percent, which was the most since 2007.
Most reports, including the Thomson Reuters survey, point to a booming economy, tax reform and a busy M&A market as reasons for the strong law firm market.
That strong market appears to be increasingly benefiting firms of all sizes. While most of the industry's demand growth has come in recent years from the highest end of the market, the Am Law 100, the Thomson Reuters report says demand lifted for firms of all sizes last quarter. That marks the first time since 2015 that Am Law 100, Second Hundred and midsize firms all experienced demand growth in the same quarter.
Still, Am Law 100 firms are outpacing their peers. With 3.8 percent growth in billable hours in the third quarter, demand for the 100 largest firms by revenue is now up 2.5 percent on the year. Am Law Second Hundred firms saw demand grow 1.9 percent in the third quarter to bring their yearly growth to 0.5 percent. Demand for midsize firms' time rose 0.5 percent in the third quarter and is now up 0.4 percent year-to-date.
Demand was not the only bright spot: Rates and productivity also saw gains, bringing a Thomson Reuters-developed composite score for the health of the legal market up to a 63 out of 100, from 62. It marked the first time that score has risen in consecutive quarters since early 2015.
On the rates front, average worked rates—a figure of what lawyers charge on their bills—rose 3.1 percent in the third quarter to bring the yearly growth to 3.3 percent compared with this time last year. It was the fifth consecutive quarter of worked-rate growth of 3 percent or higher.
Worked-rate growth was also more evenly dispersed among firms. All segments (Am Law 100, Second Hundred and midsize firms) saw increases of at least 3 percent.
Realization rates against those rates—the percentage of a worked rate that a firm collects—also rose in the third quarter to 89.4 percent. That is a slight improvement over last year, but has yet to recover from post-recession highs.
Productivity rose 1.3 percent in the third quarter as a result of improved demand and restrained head count growth, Thomson Reuters said. Head count for the Am Law 100 is up 1.6 percent year-to-date after growing by 2.1 percent in the third quarter. Am Law Second Hundred and midsize firms have seen head count grow by 0.5 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively, for the year.
More Reading:
Law Firms Just Turned in their Best Half Since the Recession
Report Says Law Firm Demand Hit New Heights in Second Quarter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250