Legal Industry Experiences 3 Quarters of Strong Demand and Revenue Growth
A Citi Private Bank report said many firms showed wider profit margins because demand and billing rates grew at a level that outpaced an increase in expenses
November 14, 2018 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
The legal industry has experienced revenue growth through the first three quarters of 2018, as demand and billing rates grew at a level that outpaced an increase in expenses and created a wider profit margin for many firms, according to a new survey from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Citi Private Bank on Wednesday released high-level results and takeaways from a law firm advisory services 9-month flash survey that painted a largely positive picture of the legal industry's business results so far this year. The survey drew on participation from 190 law firms of varying size—44 Am Law 50 firms; 35 Am Law 51-100 firms; 51 Am Law Second Hundred firms; and 60 others—a group that includes boutique and niche firms.
Across the legal sector, Citi reported revenue growth through the first three quarters of 2018, attributing that to a combination of higher billing rates and demand growth. But the bank also noted that revenue growth was “tempered” by a slow cycle of law firm collections.
David Altuna, client advisor and senior vice president of Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said in an interview on Wednesday that the legal industry is still in a period of modest growth, particularly when compared to conditions that prevailed prior to the recession of a decade ago. But the demand increases in 2018 are a positive sign, he added.
“Here we are in 2018 and we have demand growth of 2.5 percent at the 9-month point,” he said. “That's a really healthy story.”
The survey also looked at expenses, which Citi said have increased this year as well, driven in larger part by higher compensation compared with increases in operating costs. Expanding on those findings, Altuna said raises for associates this year have contributed to an acceleration in compensation increases.
While expenses grew, they did so at a lesser rate than the revenue growth, a dynamic that has created a widened profit margin on average across the industry, according to Citi. But there's more to the story when looking at firms of different sizes. Altuna said the top 50 Am Law firms have borne a higher expense burden in light of associate pay increases, compared with other smaller firms.
“What we're seeing in 2018 is more expense pressure than we might expect in a year of top-line growth,” said Altuna. “It's showing you the pressure that adds when you raise comp across the associate scale.”
But at the same time, he added, those top-earning firms have had an outsized impact on revenue growth in the legal industry as a whole, a dynamic that offers some offsetting to the expense pressure from increased lawyer compensation. The Am Law Second Hundred, meanwhile, has seen less robust revenue growth and are still feeling pressure from operating expenses.
“In a lot of these results, you're seeing a lot of dispersion across market sectors,” said Altuna. “The revenue story is being driven disproportionately by the Am Law 50.”
The Citi survey also showed positive signs for the rest of the year. Specifically, the bank reported that inventory has grown at law firms, primarily due to increases in unbilled time but also due to increases in accounts receivable. Altuna described the inventory results as a “tailwind” that builds on strong economic markers in other areas. And, he said, the increase in inventory should lead to a strong collection season this year.
“We do expect firms to collect on most of that,” said Altuna. “We've heard from firms that they're very focused on collections this year.”
Citi's positive survey results come on the heels of a Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Index third quarter report that showed demand in the legal industry had reached a post-recession high.
The third quarter surveys from both Citi and Thomson Reuters also build on signs from earlier this year that pointed toward strong financials in the legal industry. In a half-year review issued in August, Citi said that the first half of the year saw the industry increase revenue by 5.5 percent, the highest such increase since 2007.
That revenue growth has since accelerated to 6.3 percent through the first three quarters of 2018, according to Citi's latest survey.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Former Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
- 2$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
- 3King & Spalding Leaves Texas Patent Case After Client Stops Paying
- 4Knowable Launches Generative AI-Powered Tool Suite Ask Knowable
- 5Pike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250