Build or Buy? Orrick to Do Both as Firm Plans to Invest in Legal Tech Startups
When it comes to legal technology, a growing number of law firms are opting to be more than just consumers.
November 15, 2018 at 05:58 AM
4 minute read
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's partners aren't strangers to investing in startups. The San Francisco-founded firm has a fund that has invested in tech ventures for roughly three decades.
The firm is now planning to go further by investing specifically in legal technology startups, as part of a multipronged effort to keep on the cutting edge of changes to its own industry. The firm last year launched an internal software development team, Orrick Labs, that is designing its own tech solutions for the firm.
Orrick announced on Thursday that it plans to invest up to $250,000 in legal tech startups that are receiving bigger rounds of funding from major venture capital firms. The firm anticipates making about two such investments a year that will also allow the firm's lawyers to beta test promising new software.
Other firms, including Dentons' Nextlaw Ventures and Baker McKenzie, have also begun investing in legal tech startups. Foley & Lardner and Allen & Overy are among firms that have developed incubators that give space and some legal advice to young companies.
|
➤➤ For more reporting on the evolving legal industry, check out The Law Firm Disrupted briefing from Law.com. Sign up here.
Don Keller, a partner in Orrick's Silicon Valley office who leads its technology practice, said the firm is launching its investment program as a way to augment its own development of legal software. But the firm decided to limit its investments to $250,000—already more than the $50,000 or $100,000 investments it makes in other tech startups—because it doesn't want to be the main source of funding for young companies.
“I think the interesting question for us, ultimately, is how big of an Orrick Labs organization do we build internally?” Keller said. “Because at the end of the day, we're not a software company. That's not our expertise. There is a certain amount we want to do of that because we're not finding it in the market.”
Keller said there is a more compelling case for investing in legal tech companies as the market matures and as law firms become more sophisticated users of technology. One potential driver of legal tech adoption, Keller said, will be the ability of law firms to pass on the cost of technology to clients.
For instance, Orrick is rolling out a new, cloud-based version of a “data site” platform that lets clients access documents. About 1,000 clients currently have access to their own data site, Keller said. The cost of the cloud-based service, which is isolated for individual clients, may be able to be passed on. As more cloud-based services are priced in that way, Keller said firms will be more willing to invest in them.
“That opening is extremely significant to the development of this legal tech market, actually,” Keller said.
While the firm has already decided to be a legal tech investor, Keller said it may eventually be a seller of products as well. That would stem from products being developed by its Orrick Labs group, which could eventually develop into a spun-off software development business. That is an approach being mulled by Chapman and Cutler after the firm last week sold an internally developed software application to Net Documents.
“You get the best of both worlds,” Keller said. “You get access to [the products] and you get more developers. We have a team of developers, but we don't have 100. And we don't want 100. But if you spun it out, you could have 100.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Eckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250