Ex-Dewey CFO Jailed After Failing to Pay $1M Fine
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Robert Stolz ordered Joel Sanders, the former Dewey & LeBoeuf CFO convicted last year on felony charges related to a scheme to defraud the defunct firm's lenders and investors, into custody.
November 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM
6 minute read
Former Dewey & LeBoeuf chief financial officer Joel Sanders was led out of a New York courtroom in handcuffs Thursday after a judge found he willfully failed to pay part of a $1 million fine in his sentence on felony convictions.
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Robert Stolz on Thursday ordered Sanders into custody after shooting down a bid from the former Dewey executive and his defense lawyer, DLA Piper partner Christopher Oprison, to have the $1 million fine reduced or revoked.
Sanders owes the penalty following his conviction on felony charges stemming from a scheme to defraud the defunct law firm's investors and lenders before its 2012 collapse. His sentence included three years of conditional discharge, requiring him to pay the $1 million fine in three equal yearly installments and to complete 750 hours of community service.
In court papers filed late last month, Oprison argued that Sanders couldn't make his first yearly installment on the fine without putting himself and his family into dire financial straits.
But at a hearing Thursday, Stolz noted that Sanders owns, outright, a house in Long Island worth at least $650,000 and has about $850,000 in equity on an oceanfront condominium in Miami Beach, Florida, that's worth around $1 million. The judge also pointed out that Sanders and his wife have leases on “two high-end cars”—one an Audi and the other a Mercedes-Benz.
“I find the defendant willfully failed to pay his fine,” Stolz said Thursday. “I find the claimed inability to pay here not credible.”
In light of Stolz's ruling, Sanders can be jailed for up to a year until he pays the full $1 million fine. He is now in the custody of the New York Department of Corrections. That order was in line with Sanders' original sentence, which said the former Dewey CFO “shall be imprisoned for one year until the fine is satisfied” if he failed to pay, the judge said.
After the judge's decision, court officers took the former Dewey executive, who was wearing a dark blue suit Thursday, out of the courtroom in handcuffs as two of Sanders' family members looked on.
Reached for comment on Thursday afternoon, Oprison said his client was looking for a way to pay the fine in short order.
“It's a travesty,” Oprison said about Stolz's ruling. “I think it's completely unjust. This is the last person you want to put away and send away in prison, and I think it's really unfortunate it came to this.”
He added, “We're going to try to pay.”
Before ruling, Stolz heard arguments from Oprison and assistant district attorney Peirce Moser, chief of the tax crimes unit at the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and the lead prosecutor on the Dewey fraud case against Sanders and other former firm executives.
The hearing Thursday originally was scheduled as a check-in roughly a year after Sanders received his sentence in October 2017. But ahead of the status hearing, Oprison urged the judge to revoke or reduce the $1 million fine. Sanders was unable to pay the first-year installment of $333,333, “despite best efforts to earn, raise, generate or borrow the funds to do so,” Oprison said in court papers filed in October.
Reiterating that argument on Thursday, Oprison told Stolz that Sanders would have liked a “de minimis” reduction to the fine that would bring the total to $250,000 to be paid out in installments. Sanders has complied with the community service requirements—having completed about 340 hours already—and was not seeking any adjustment on that piece of his sentence.
Oprison said that despite the residences and other assets, Sanders has had trouble accessing mainstream banks since his felony conviction and doesn't have a clear path to turn those holdings into cash that could be used to pay down his fine.
“This is not an individual who's not making an effort,” Oprison said Thursday. He later added, “The practicality is these are not liquid assets.”
But those arguments were met with forceful opposition from Moser of the DA's office, and skeptical questions from Stolz. Moser argued that Sanders likely could have paid the fine at any point since his sentencing, but said that at the very least, the former Dewey CFO had assets that would have allowed him to pay the first $333,333 yearly installment.
“He's failed to explain why he did not set aside money” to satisfy the fine payments, said Moser.
The prosecutor, whose office also filed court papers last week opposing Sanders' request for a reduced fine, told Stolz that the former Dewey CFO had missed the proper deadline to make his first payment on the fine and only asked for the reduction six weeks after that deadline passed.
Stolz appeared unpersuaded by Oprison's argument that Sanders couldn't pay. The judge took part of the hearing to run through Sanders' assets, including his salary at Greenspoon Marder, where he is chief operating officer; the residences on Long Island and in Miami; the leased cars and certain securities holdings. “It's kind of adding up here, counsel,” Stolz said to Oprison at one point.
In light of his finding that Sanders willfully neglected his obligation to pay the fine, the judge ultimately said that he could have re-sentenced the former Dewey executive altogether and that such an altered sentence could have included a term of confinement. Stolz, however, said he was not going that far on Thursday and would keep the original sentence in place.
“This is someone who could be simply locked up on this record,” said Stolz. “I'm not doing that.”
A spokeswoman for Greenspoon Marder did not immediately respond to a request for comment. While Sanders works there, the firm was not involved in the criminal case.
— Additional reporting contributed by Christine Simmons
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker McKenzie Taps Associate, IBM Watson's Brian Kuhn to Lead AI Transformation Team
4 minute readLaw Firms Dominate Opioid Maker's Creditors as Weil Takes Counsel Role for Insys
4 minute readJay-Z, Quinn Emanuel Say AAA Offers Only 'Token' Black Arbitrators
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250