There's a Bit of Gabe MacConaill in All of Us
The cult of perfectionism is pervasive in law firms—the notion that you should feel deep shame about an inconsequential typo or experience terror for not properly reading the unstated wishes of some client or senior partner.
November 15, 2018 at 11:42 AM
4 minute read
|
Above all else, it was painful to read Joanna Litt's essay about the suicide of her husband, Gabe MacConaill, a 42-year-old partner at Sidley Austin in Los Angeles. Whether you agree or not with Litt that “Big Law Killed My Husband,” elements of that story will certainly hit home with just about everyone who's spent more than an hour in a big law firm.
For me, it brought me back to my days as a young associate decades ago—and the memories it unveiled were not pleasant. It took me back to a time when I felt constantly unsure, nervous and unmoored.
Among Litt's descriptions of her husband's anxieties, this one struck a particular chord: “He said he felt like a phony who had everyone fooled about his abilities as a lawyer, and thought after this case was over, he was going to be fired.”
For the five years or so I spent as a corporate associate, that feeling that I was merely posing as a lawyer rang true. Did I really know what I was doing? Did I grasp all the tax, securities and other complicated legal issues underlying the deal? Surely not. And even if I did something well—wrote a good research memo, drafted a decent contract or kept a client happy for another day—wasn't it just a lark?
Of course, I never rose to the career heights that MacConaill did. Never tried. Never even thought of trying.
Which is what makes MacConaill's story even more jarring: He already had passed the big test and won the grand prize of partnership. He was an experienced, well-regarded bankruptcy lawyer at a top firm. Yet, he basically felt as insecure and vulnerable as some random junior associate on rotation.
I find that remarkable, yet I'm not entirely surprised. The Big Law profession doesn't give you much sense of security—much less validation or warmth. It's such a cliché, but it's true: You're only as good as your last deal or case, and you live in constant fear that the client or rainmaking partner who's giving you work might cut you off any moment.
In trying to understand her husband's suicide, Litt writes that she read about the concept of “maladaptive perfectionism, that combines unrealistic standards of achievement with hypercriticism of failing to meet them.” She adds, “Gabe displayed most if not all of the characteristics. Simply put, he would rather die than live with the consequences of people thinking he was a failure.”
The cult of perfectionism is indeed pervasive in law firms—the notion that you should feel deep shame about an inconsequential typo or experience terror for not properly reading the unstated wishes of some client or senior partner. Even as an associate, I always found all of this ridiculous, but it's hard not be caught in that culture when you're in it.
MacConaill seemed to have been totally steeped in that culture. His wife had suggested to him that he quit, and “he said he couldn't quit in the middle of a case,” adding, “the irony is not lost on me that he found it easier to kill himself.” She also writes: “We spoke a handful of times about how he should just try to care less about the work, but knowing the kind of person my husband was, that was never going to happen.”
As I said at the beginning of this post, it's ultimately just sad. What makes it profoundly even sadder is that he seemed to have killed himself over the pressures of being a lawyer. And what prompted all of this—at least in the immediate picture—is a goddamned bankruptcy for a mattress company. He wasn't working on curing a horrible disease, solving world hunger or stopping terrorism.
What killed MacConaill was the type of work most lawyers do: helping a company make or save money. Nothing flashy. Nothing life-altering. Which is what makes it all so prosaic, poignant and simply sad.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250