A Week Early, Cravath Kicks Off Associate Bonus Season
The end-of-year bonuses are on top of associate salary increases this year.
November 19, 2018 at 05:15 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
(Update: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison also detailed end-of-year bonuses in a memo to associates Monday, with amounts matching those announced by Cravath.)
Despite the uptick in associate salaries this year, Cravath, Swaine & Moore announced Monday that it would stick to the same year-end bonus scale as recent years, with first-year associates receiving $15,000 and senior associates receiving up to $100,000.
The announcement by the Wall Street firm, first reported by Above the Law, sets the stage for the rest of the elite legal market to either match or tailor their holiday payouts to their own needs.
Cravath is sending a particularly early notice for the industry. Its announcement, just three days before Thanksgiving, comes about a week earlier than the firm's bonus announcements in the last two years.
The bonuses are on top of a major round of associate salary increases this year, in which Cravath matched salaries set by Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy for its junior associates but increased salaries further for midlevel and senior associates.
Cravath also doled out a midyear “special” bonuses in late June, akin to those announced by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett earlier this year.
According to the Cravath memo dated Nov. 19, year-end bonuses will be paid Friday, Dec. 14. Just as before, the firm does not apply any billable hour criteria for determining eligibility for associate bonuses. “Virtually all our associates will receive the full bonus,” the memo said.
Meanwhile, bonuses for senior attorneys, specialist attorneys, senior discovery attorneys and foreign associate attorneys will be determined on an individual basis, according to Cravath's memo.
A firm spokeswoman for Cravath declined to comment.
“Only firms that compete with Cravath for associates need to be competitive with their comp scale,” said Kent Zimmermann, a law firm management consultant at the Zeughauser Group. “But if history is any guide, a very large number of firms across the country will eventually follow. This will increase the magnitude of the bubble that has been growing on associate comp. I predict it will burst when the economy softens.”
While firms are now spending more on overhead, large firms are also seeing more demand and revenue growth, according to recent surveys. According to the Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Index, demand at large law firms grew more in the third quarter of 2018 than any three-month period since 2011.
And Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group reported revenue growth through the first three quarters of 2018, attributing that to a combination of higher billing rates and demand growth.
Here is the full bonus scale announced Monday by Cravath:
- Class of 2018 — $15,000 (prorated)
- Class of 2017 — $15,000
- Class of 2016 — $25,000
- Class of 2015 — $50,000
- Class of 2014 — $65,000
- Class of 2013 — $80,000
- Class of 2012 — $90,000
- Class of 2011 — $100,000
- Class of 2010 — $100,000
Meghan Tribe contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Eckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250