Debevoise Launches New Feedback Program for Associates
“We've really focused on coaching, not grading,” said Nicole Mesard, chair of Debevoise & Plimpton's hiring committee, who helped develop the new program.
November 19, 2018 at 02:58 PM
3 minute read
Beginning this month, Debevoise & Plimpton is implementing a new feedback scheme across its U.S. offices that will place an emphasis on constant and consistent feedback for associates, aiming to make them better attorneys, faster.
The New York-based firm launched a pilot of its new feedback program earlier this year with about 120 lawyers in two of its practices groups, becoming the latest large law firm to revamp its performance management regime in recent years. Over the next six months, Debevoise & Plimpton will roll out the new program to its other U.S. practice groups, and then eventually overseas.
“We've given a lot of thought to what it is like to be an associate at Debevoise,” said Nicole Mesard, chair of the firm's hiring committee and deputy chair of its corporate department. “What do our associates want from their experience at the firm, and what do we want them to achieve here at the firm? Once they're here, they're ours, and we want to make them as great as we can.”
The program builds on Debevoise & Plimpton's existing efforts to help new lawyers meet the requirements of a Big Law practice and career as quickly as possible.
For the last eight years, the firm has partnered with Columbia Business School to conduct a business education program for incoming associates. During their first three weeks at Debevoise & Plimpton, associates take part in an immersion program that is intended to get them up to speed on concepts critical to their clients' businesses.
But for all that sort of training offers, nothing is as beneficial as being on the job with more experienced lawyers. “That's where the learning really happens,” Mesard said.
So Mesard, along with Debevoise & Plimpton litigation partner Maeve O'Connor, worked to develop a feedback program that would give associates more real-time coaching to help them improve while working on matters, rather than relying on formal reviews twice a year.
“We've really focused on coaching, not grading,” Mesard said.
After completing a one-and-a-half hour orientation, attorneys circle back with their practice groups. Partners, counsel and other senior attorneys are then expected to give feedback on a constant basis to associates they oversee. Every six to eight weeks, the practice groups meet with a facilitator in ”dialogue sessions” to talk about best practices and to ask for advice.
“It's an incredibly collaborative process because we all show each other how vulnerable we are,” Mesard said. “It's not easy, [but] we expect all lawyers to be giving feedback, even our most junior lawyers.”
Beyond the dialogue sessions, the firm conducts surveys on a regular basis to monitor the amount of feedback happening. So far, the firm says, those numbers are continually increasing.
“The arrow is pointing up in terms of amount of feedback people are getting and receiving,” Mesard said.
As with any big changes, there will undoubtedly be hiccups along the way, she acknowledged.
“We can't change everybody,” Mesard said. “But even if associates are getting 50 percent more feedback than they used to, even 25 percent more than they used to—wow, isn't that great.”
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250