DLA Piper Nabs Partner From Goodwin Procter
Christine Walchuk represents public and private companies in the life sciences and pharma sectors.
November 29, 2018 at 02:50 PM
2 minute read
DLA Piper has added bench strength to its northern Virginia offices with the hire of corporate partner Christine Walchuk from Goodwin Procter.
Walchuk advises public and private companies in the pharmaceutical, life sciences, and technology sectors on a broad range of transactions and commercial matters, including mergers, acquisitions, spin-outs, public offerings, licensing, research and development, profit-sharing, and distribution and manufacturing arrangements.
“I've done deals opposite DLA Piper attorneys in various transactions at my last couple of firms. Their corporate practice is known worldwide,” Walchuk said. “I will be working very closely with the corporate team here, whether it's on M&A deals, IPOs, or financings.”
Walchuk said life sciences as an exciting field in law now, given the sheer number of first-in-class therapies that are under development or seeking regulatory approval. Companies in the life sciences and pharma sectors tend to need specialized help with a broad range of issues and challenges, she said.
“I've been able to focus a great deal on the licensing and partnering side, to help companies with their transactional needs across the product life cycle, everything from early-stage R&D to manufacturing to getting a product on the market and maintaining it,” Walchuk said.
Walchuk also brings deal-pricing savvy to her new role. A core part of her practice involves helping parties in a merger or sale of assets to arrive at pricing that reflects a fair valuation of the intellectual property, including assets still a long way from being on the market. Pricing structures have grown increasingly complex in recent years, as they must take into account the future value of pharmaceutical products still under development, she said.
“You'll still see equities exchanged, as in a traditional M&A transaction, but the parties may agree to milestones or royalty payments that come at the back end, after certain commercial achievements have been realized. This shares the risk a little bit, helps the buyers feel that they are getting to see that the technology in question proves itself, and helps each side get a little bit of comfort,” Walchuk explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
3 minute readEight Years On, A&O Shearman’s Fuse Legal Tech Incubator Is Still Evolving
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 2Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
- 3Medical Student's Error Takes Center Stage in High Court 'Agency' Dispute
- 4'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 5Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250