Bentham Launches Second US-Focused Litigation Finance Vehicle as Capital Grows
For litigation funders, money keeps coming in the door. But can they put it to use?
November 30, 2018 at 02:10 PM
2 minute read
For litigation financiers, the money just keeps coming in the door.
Australia-based IMF Bentham Ltd. announced Thursday its U.S. arm had raised $275 million from outside investors, with the expectation that it will raise a further $125 million by the end of the year. By adding $100 million of the company's own money, Bentham expects a $500 million investment vehicle will satisfy its capital needs for the U.S. market for the next four years, said Allison Chock, the company's U.S. chief investment officer.
The broader litigation finance community has now raised more than $2 billion since the end of 2016, according to reporting from The American Lawyer. Burford Capital Ltd. in October raised $250 million in a stock sale, and said at the time that it plans to “shortly” issue debt and raise a new private fund.
Chock said the money was needed, as Bentham's first U.S.-based fund, closed in February last year, has committed about 98 percent of its capital. That deal involved a $100 million upfront investment from the hedge fund Fortress Capital alongside an initial $33 million investment from IMF Bentham itself.
For the year ending June 30, Bentham said it had made $321 million worth of investments, up from $191 million the year prior.
The latest fund raised by Bentham is primarily backed by Partners Capital, which manages $24 billion in assets, IMF Bentham said. It also includes a provision that could allow the total investment in the fund to grow to $1 billion, Bentham said.
With all the money coming in, litigation funders will be under increased pressure to find cases worth investing in.
Bentham said in a statement it has seen a 110 percent rise in “qualified applications” for U.S.-based investment opportunities, or cases worth considering as investments, over the last three years. Chock said large law firms are increasingly seeing litigation finance as a way to provide clients more flexible fee arrangements than simply the billable hour.
“The larger firms are starting to key into why this may actually help them survive in the long-run,” Chock said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250