Winston Seeks Nearly $1M From Would-Be Virginia Arena Developer
A failed attempt to build an 18,000-seat sports arena in Virginia Beach, Virginia, has turned into a legal grab bag, with Winston & Strawn the latest to seek its money.
December 07, 2018 at 04:36 PM
3 minute read
Winston & Strawn on Thursday filed a lawsuit in New York federal court seeking nearly $1 million in attorney fees and costs it says it's owed by a developer that sought to build an ocean-side sports arena in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
The lawsuit, which seeks $833,790 in attorney fees plus damages, is part of a broader legal shakeout stemming from the failed effort by Mid-Atlantic Arena LLC to build an 18,000-seat arena in Virginia Beach.
MAA, which Winston sued on Thursday, in January filed a complaint against Virginia Beach, seeking $140 million in damages after the company said the city backed out of the project.
Leading up to Winston's lawsuit, MAA had told Winston the firm would not be paid its legal bills related to work on a loan until the developer's lawsuit with the city was completed, the complaint says. That was after Winston was told by MAA executives that they understood they would have to pay lawyer fees regardless of the project's success, the firm says.
“As I am sure you understand … if for some reason the transaction does not move forward, we would still need to be paid for all the work performed,” Winston partner Alan Hoffman wrote in an email to MAA executives on Nov. 6, 2017, according to court documents.
“We understand,” replied an executive for the company that owned MAA, The ESG Companies, which did not immediately return a request for comment on the lawsuit.
Winston says its lawyers spent nearly 1,000 hours representing JPMorgan Chase & Co. in closing a $167 million loan related to the project.
Work on the loan agreement was ultimately for naught, however.
The Virginia Beach city council voted on Nov. 7, 2017, to terminate its development with MAA unless the loan closed before midnight that day, Winston says in its complaint. Despite the loan closing “several hours” before that deadline, the city terminated the agreement the next day and failed to convey to MAA the land where the arena was to be built.
Winston's lawsuit says MAA is nearing insolvency in the wake of the failed arena project. The company said in its lawsuit against the city that it had been forced to refund deposits for personal seat licenses at the arena worth over $15 million, in addition to losing income from the naming rights of the stadium worth $10 million. The company said it lost future profits from the stadium of more than $140 million.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
3 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readAI Expected to Transform Legal Field Even More as Technologies Evolve
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250