In Firm's First Year, Selendy & Gay Tops Cravath on Associate Bonuses
Selendy & Gay will offer its associates a range of year-end bonuses at 150 percent of the Cravath scale, plus a special one-time bonus for lawyers who have signed on during the firm's first year.
December 10, 2018 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
|
If year-end bonuses are any indication, times are good at Selendy & Gay—less than a year after it launched with a group of former Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan lawyers. On Monday, the 30-lawyer firm announced a bonus scale that beats the market rate for large defense firms set earlier this year by Cravath, Swaine & Moore.
Selendy & Gay will offer its associates a range of year-end bonuses at 150 percent of the Cravath scale—from $22,500 for the most junior Selendy & Gay associates up to $135,000 for the most senior associates from the class of 2012. On top of those year-end bonuses, associates are also in line to receive a special, one-time bonus as a reward for joining Selendy & Gay during its launch year.
The firm's bonuses beat the scale handed out by several firms at the top end of the market, including Cravath; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; and Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, among others. The Cravath scale for bonuses ranged from $15,000 for first-year associates to $100,000 for associates from the class of 2010.
Excluding the special “start-up” bonus for 2018, Selendy & Gay's year-end bonuses fall in line with those of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz, another boutique firm started by former Am Law 100 lawyers in 2016. Wilkinson Walsh has pegged its associate bonuses to 150 percent of the Cravath scale for each of the past two years. Still, most firms fall short of Susman Godfrey, which tends to be an outlier on associate pay. That firm announced Monday that its associates would receive between $100,000 and $225,000 in year-end bonuses.
In a statement about the Selendy & Gay bonus scale, firm co-managing partner Jennifer Selendy pointed to the quality of the work the firm's associates performed in 2018 and a broader commitment to pay associates above the market rates. In addition to the year-end and start-up bonuses for associates, Selendy & Gay was among a group of firms that earlier this year announced top annual salaries for its associates, starting at $190,000 for first-years.
“We are committed to rewarding our associates at levels well above the market, and we look forward to building our firm with more superb associates in 2019,” said Selendy.
Beyond recognizing associates' work in 2018, the bonuses also serve as a reflection on the financial and courtroom success that Selendy & Gay has had in its first year, the firm's other co-managing partner, David Elsberg, told The American Lawyer on Monday.
“We had high expectations about how the firm would perform financially, and happily, we've been meeting and even exceeding those expectations,” Elsberg said.
From Elsberg's perspective, the firm has done well because of the contributions of its associates. As one specific example, Elsberg said a trio of associates were integrally involved in a recent weeklong arbitration proceeding the firm handled for a client—each of the three examined witnesses during the arbitration, and one of them handled a portion of the closing arguments.
On one hand, Elsberg said that's a sign of follow-through on one of the key tenets the firm has had since its founding—to train a new generation of leading trial lawyers. But it's also an indication of how Selendy & Gay associates have played into the firm's financial and courtroom success.
“That's representative of the type of thing we're doing here, and that we are able to do because of the quality of the associates we have,” said Elsberg. “We're recruiting the best associates, and what we pay them should reflect the fact that we're hiring the best.”
The full scale for Selendy & Gay associate bonuses by year is as follows:
- Class of 2018 — $22,500
- Class of 2017 — $22,500
- Class of 2016 — $37,500
- Class of 2015 — $75,000
- Class of 2014 — $97,500
- Class of 2013 — $120,000
- Class of 2012 — $135,000
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250