Ropes & Gray Report Charts Gymnastics Officials' Failure to End Abuse
The firm was hired to conduct the probe in the wake of the Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal.
December 10, 2018 at 07:20 PM
4 minute read
Less than a week after filing for Chapter 11 protection, USA Gymnastics is facing renewed scrutiny after a report released by Ropes & Gray on Monday found that the organization failed to protect athletes from sexual abuse.
The 233-page report follows a 10-month independent investigation by the law firm to determine what USA Gymnastics (USAG) and U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) officials knew about the sexual abuse of hundreds of elite and Olympic gymnasts by former national team doctor and convicted molester Dr. Larry Nassar.
“Our aim was to get to the bottom of what went wrong,” Ropes & Gray partners Joan McPhee and James Dowden, who led the investigation, said in a joint statement.
“It remains our sincere hope that our factual findings will inform efforts going forward to protect young athletes, and will help to ensure that a predator like Nassar can never again find so accommodating a home in sport,” they said.
A special committee of the USOC's board of directors commissioned Ropes & Gray in February to conduct an investigation into the decades-long abuse and determine when USAG officials or the USOC first became aware of Nassar's conduct and what they did with the information.
McPhee joined Ropes & Gray in 1990 after serving as an assistant U.S. attorney and deputy chief of the Appeals Unit in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
Dowden, a former clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, first joined Ropes & Gray in 2001 as an associate. In 2007, he joined the U.S. Attorney's Office in the District of Massachusetts in Boston in the economic crimes and public corruptions units before rejoining the firm in 2012.
In interviews with 100 current and former USAG and USOC employees and after reviewing over 1.3 million documents, the lawyers found that top officials at the institutions ignored red flags, and in some extreme circumstances dismissed “clear calls for help” from Nassar's victims.
“Nassar's sexual abuse of hundreds of girls and young women was a manifestation of a broader set of factors and conditions in elite gymnastics and Olympic sport that allowed the abuse to occur and then to continue uninterrupted for almost 30 years,” McPhee and Dowden said in their statement.
“The fact that so many different institutions and individuals failed to stop him does not excuse any of them, but instead reflects the collective failure to protect young athletes,” they said.
Last Wednesday, the USAG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District of Indiana. For its bankruptcy filing, USAG turned to Jenner & Block partner Catherine Steege, who co-chairs the firm's restructuring and bankruptcy and bankruptcy litigation practices, and to partners Dean Panos and Melissa Root.
The organization listed estimated assets and liabilities of $50 to $100 million in its filing.
In a statement, USAG's newly appointed board chair, Kathryn Carson, said the Chapter 11 filing would allow the sport governing body to “expedite resolution of claims” by survivors abused by Nassar.
Carson, former chief legal officer for the U.S. Golf Association and general counsel of Pepsi-Cola North America, took over as chair in late November, replacing retired Ernst & Young executive Karen Golz, who stepped down in June.
In addition to handling the claims of Nassar survivors, the USAG's bankruptcy filing notes that the organization is on the hunt for a new president and CEO.
After just four days as interim CEO of the USAG, former Congresswoman Mary Bono resigned from the organization in early October after she posted a photo of herself blacking out a Nike logo on her golf shoes, apparently in response to the brand's Colin Kaepernick ad campaign.
Bono, the widow of musician Sonny Bono, served as senior vice president for Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting, an affiliate of the Am Law 100 firm Faegre Baker Daniels, whose former partner Scott Himsel represented USAG as the Nassar scandal unfolded.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Partner Moves to Vinson & Elkins as Co-Head of Strategic M&A
3 minute readFreshfields, Paul Hastings, McDermott, Alston Hire in Core Practices, Amid Flurry of Q4 Lateral Moves
5 minute readMorgan Lewis, Mayer Brown Add New Partners in Chicago
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250