CBS Leaks Put Debevoise, Covington Under Scrutiny for Handling of Confidential Witnesses
As CBS considers the legal fallout after findings from an internal investigation of sexual misconduct allegations went public last week, two major law firms leading the probe face questions about their efforts to protect confidential witnesses. For Debevoise & Plimpton, this marks the second time this year the firm has been thrust into the spotlight for such a failure.
December 13, 2018 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
For the second time this year, Debevoise & Plimpton has come under scrutiny for the way it handled confidential witnesses amid an internal investigation into sexual misconduct. In the most recent incident, news reports have stated that confidential witnesses may have been compromised when a draft report on sexual misconduct allegations at CBS Corp. leaked to the press.
Debevoise's Mary Jo White was tapped earlier this year, alongside Covington & Burling's Nancy Kestenbaum, to conduct an internal investigation into alleged sexual misconduct on the part of former CEO Leslie Moonves, as first reported by The New Yorker, and former “60 Minutes” executive Jeff Fager. The findings of the investigation may play into a decision that CBS's board is expected to make in January regarding whether Moonves was fired for cause—a determination that would impact whether he receives a potential $120 million severance package.
The internal investigation appears to be ongoing, although multiple news reports indicated that it is in the final results and the findings will likely be presented to the CBS board of directors soon. But the investigation has drawn scrutiny after The New York Times viewed and published details Dec. 4 and Dec. 6 from a draft of the team's investigative report, including descriptions of “transactional” oral sex that Moonves allegedly received from CBS employees. Moonves, represented by Dechert's Andrew Levander, has denied the sexual misconduct accusations.
In light of the revelations in the draft investigatory report, the Wall Street Journal, Vanity Fair and the New York Post have all reported this week that CBS's current top brass is concerned about the company's legal exposure in light of the public airing of the investigation's draft findings. Those concerns include a worry that employees and other witnesses who cooperated with the internal CBS investigation were promised confidentiality and that the leaks may have compromised that expectation of secrecy, according to this week's news reports.
The investigative team acknowledged those concerns in an emailed statement Thursday.
“Covington and Debevoise take this matter very seriously and are working to determine the facts,” said a statement attributed to the independent investigators from both firms.
High-profile internal investigations can be fraught for lawyers who lead them and it is not uncommon to hear criticism that a law firm wasn't sufficiently independent or that it went too easy on the subject of the probe. Those sorts of criticisms were central to a lawsuit filed last month by current and former Dartmouth College students who claim the school and an outside lawyer conducted a faulty investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against three former professors at the Ivy League school.
The CBS investigation leaks, however, have thrust Debevoise and Covington into the spotlight for different reasons. And specifically for Debevoise and White—a former top federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York and head of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for several years during the Obama administration—it is not the first time an investigation has faced scrutiny over its handling of confidential witnesses.
Early in 2018, The American Lawyer reported that White apologized and conceded that an error had been made with respect to witnesses in a sexual misconduct investigation of T. Florian Jaeger, a cognitive science professor at New York's University of Rochester. In that case, when the Debevoise investigators put out their report on Jan. 11, at least some materials made public with the report briefly exposed the names of confidential witnesses before they were amended to make everyone anonymous.
White appears to now be dealing with fallout on a similar issue in the wake of the CBS leak, although it is not clear at this point that any confidential witnesses were, in fact, exposed. Still, the Wall Street Journal's report noted that White had apologized to the CBS board in a meeting after the leak.
|Read More:
CBS Taps Firms, Former Prosecutors to Lead Probe Into Moonves Harassment Allegations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250