Startup Firm Atrium Hits a Milestone With First Partner Promotions
Atrium has raised $75 million from investors. What do its newly-promoted partners say about its progress developing technology to automate the practice of law?
December 13, 2018 at 06:26 PM
5 minute read
Atrium, the Silicon Valley-backed startup law firm, on Thursday announced its first set of partner promotions. And in a twist that tracks with Atrium's vision that law firms should be run more like the corporations they advise, the new partners will be expected to help run the firm.
Atrium has been closely watched by Am Law 200 competitors because of its two-pronged business model: pairing a law firm with an investor-backed technology development business, Atrium Legal Technology Solutions, Inc.
Founded by serial entrepreneur Justin Kan a year and a half ago, Atrium has already raised about $75 million in venture financing. In September it raised $65 million in a financing round led by the highly regarded venture firm Andreessen Horowitz.
Hans Kim and Jon O'Connell are the first new partners to be made at Atrium, according to an internal memo. The promotions mean Kim and O'Connell will no longer be “general managers” and will now hold specific firm-wide management responsibilities.
In Kim's case, he is the lead for finance and business model planning, while O'Connell heads professional development and culture.
Kim had served as general manager of the firm's Atrium Counsel business unit, which provides general corporate legal services. O'Connell had the same role for the firm's Atrium Financing business unit. They were responsible for making hiring and personnel decisions within those practices; supervising and mentoring younger lawyers; managing the group's P&L statements; and setting strategies on pricing, marketing and product offerings, the memo said.
“One of the things Justin and I bonded on immediately was our shared belief that the future of legal requires a new standard of excellence in legal management,” Augie Rakow, co-founder of Atrium and former Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner, wrote in a memo to employees announcing the promotions Thursday. “The law firm of the future needs senior attorneys who are excellent legal and cross-functional managers.”
Atrium says it has represented some 280 clients. It represents emerging growth companies and offers flat-fee products. Its “Counsel” product, for instance, provides a dedicated lawyer, paralegal and a practice assistant to serve as an in-house lawyer for emerging growth companies. Those lawyers will handle cap table management, attend board meetings, review contracts and advise on employment issues.
Kim formerly worked at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison in New York and Tokyo; Kim & Chang in Seoul, South Korea; and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in Palo Alto, California. O'Connell joined Atrium from Morrison & Foerster's San Francisco office, and he formerly practiced at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in Palo Alto.
In an interview, Kim said as general manager he also worked closely with the company's software developers, which are focused on creating platforms that help lawyers work more efficiently.
“That is definitely part of our plan: To drive efficiency, and also to deliver a better product,” Kim said. “Scaling through better process-management and leveraging technology products whether it be internal tools or client-facing tools as well in the platform that we're developing.”
On that front, Kim said it had been “incredibly challenging” to build a law firm and corresponding software applications at the same time, citing a language barrier between lawyers and software developers.
“Lawyers speak a certain language, engineers speak a certain language, and that is definitely something we've improved over time,” Kim said. “It is essential that we speak the same language and develop the right products for the marketplace. In this first year, we've focused mostly on getting this [law firm] off the ground, and I think we've done an incredible job getting to where we are.”
Still, Kim said he felt the firm has an advantage in developing legal tech products given the proximity of the lawyers to the engineers. They work together in the same room, Kim said.
“Having the technology team directly in the same room of the legal team is showing great benefits,” Kim said. “We could not be doing this if we were in separate locations. If we were in separate locations, the communication issues would be, I think, an impossible bridge.”
Kim said the firm's clients have raised over half a billion dollars in venture capital financing in the firm's 18 months. For his part, O'Connell said he had been impressed with the firm's dedication to getting feedback from clients.
“When you're working with people who aren't lawyers in Silicon Valley, there is a heavy focus on the customers, in our case, the clients,” O'Connell said. “And we're focused on improving our service based on the feedback. It's different than in a traditional law firm setting where it's not very common, I think, for people to solicit feedback.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
1 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250