Proskauer Advised Bain Capital Specialty Finance on $145.5 Million IPO
Regulatory changes may foster greater opportunities for lawyers in the BDC IPO space, lawyers say.
December 18, 2018 at 03:33 PM
5 minute read
Proskauer Rose advised on Bain Capital Specialty Finance's initial public offering, which raised roughly $145.4 million when the shares began trading last month.
Ropes & Gray represented the underwriters.
The company, which is the finance arm of global asset manager Bain Capital, sold 7.5 million shares and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on Nov. 15. It is a business development company (BDC) focused on lending to middle-market companies and is managed by an affiliate of Bain Capital Credit.
Proskauer corporate partners Monica Shilling and Nicole Runyan, and senior counsel Lily Desmond and tax partner Martin Hamilton, led the team from Proskauer. The Ropes & Gray team representing the underwriters was led by securities and public companies partner Paul Tropp and counsel Rachel Phillips.
“It was a great deal, with a sophisticated client and a group of banks that knew what they were doing,” Shilling said, adding that BDCs have enjoyed increasing popularity and prominence as nonbank lenders over the last 10 to 15 years.
In the interest of carrying out the transaction expeditiously, Shilling said, she and her colleagues filed an amendment to the registration statement with updated numbers the day after filing the 10Q form for the third quarter. Runyan said the team's overall approach was designed to present underwriters with the most appealing opportunity possible.
“We were thinking about, firstly, getting through the SEC registration process, and secondly, looking at the calendar in order to deal with pretty significant volatility in the market,” Runyan said. Besides the stock market's ups and downs, the team had to take into account the midterm election, which was a major market event, as they planned the third-quarter transaction.
“We looked to be as nimble as we could on the SEC front, in terms of getting an updated registration statement filed as soon as financials were available so that we could position the BDC the best possible way when underwriters saw an opening in the market,” Runyan said.
Runyan noted that it was important to maintain an open dialogue with the SEC staff who are reviewing the registration statement, as they must sign off on it before the IPO issuer can go on the road and go public.
“You can't control the market, but you can control your readiness to go the market when underwriters think there's an opening. We worked very hard with the SEC to be as proactive as possible,” Runyan said.
Proskauer said in a statement that it has expanded in the BDC space, and in the past five years has represented approximately half of the 59 publicly traded BDCs. It also said it was involved in the last four BDC IPOs. Shilling said she has been active in the BDC space since 2004, and noted that the practice gained a team of lawyers, including Nicole Runyan from Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, in March 2017. More recently, Proskauer snagged M&A and capital markets lawyer Will Tuttle, who works on many BDC-related deals, from Dechert in August 2018.
The reality is that BDC IPOs at present are not as common as some might wish, with only three in the last three years. The Bain Capital Specialty Finance IPO was the only one this year, the Carlyle Group was the only market player to do one in 2017, and Goldman Sachs was the only firm to do one in 2015, Shilling noted. But the market may be on the verge of dramatic uptick in BDC deals and, in particular, BDC IPOs, she said.
“There are private BDCs, in the sense that they are not listed, they still have to publicly file reports with the SEC. Many of these are entities that have taken in capital and made investments and are positioning themselves for IPOs,” Shilling said.
In addition, there may be an increase in BDC deals because of a change in regulations, Shilling said. In March 2018, the Small Business Credit Availability Act became law, streamlining the reporting requirements for BDCs, granting more flexibility with respect to BDCs' ability to take on debt, and making capital raising quicker and easier.
“This new legislation relaxed requirements, so that BDCs will be able to leverage more than in the past, which I think will drive more interest in the space,” Shilling said. “I'm not sure we've seen the impact of it yet, but we will. It's a great thing for the industry, and something the industry has worked very hard to get.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
1 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250