Need a Vacation? Orrick Will Foot the Bill
In the latest effort to chip away at Big Law's work-life imbalance, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe will pay up to $15,000 for its attorneys to take a weeklong vacation.
December 21, 2018 at 01:06 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers often neglect to take time for themselves. And as big firms look for ways to boost associate satisfaction and address concerns over lawyer wellness, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe is trying a new approach: paying for them to take a vacation.
In an email to its attorneys Thursday, Orrick chairman Mitch Zuklie announced that the firm would provide up to $15,000 to cover the costs of a week's vacation for its attorneys in early 2019. The money is in addition to whatever the lawyers earn during their time off as regular vacation pay.
Dubbed “Unplug On Us,” the $15,000 is available to partnership track associates who have been with the firm for at least six months, are in good standing and have put in 2,400 annual client hours over the last year, which includes pro bono, training and innovation time. Paid vacations are also available to nonpartnership track associates, project attorneys and legal assistants who billed at a slightly lower level.
“We're really taking seriously this emphasis on wellness,” said Orrick's chief talent officer Siobhan Handley.
The idea for the initiative came partly from Zuklie's own early career experience, Handley said. His former firm pushed for its attorneys to take a vacation and made a contribution toward it, she said.
“We thought, why would we not try that?” Handley said. But Orrick didn't just want to hand over additional cash to its attorneys. The firm wanted to incentivize them to actually take the time off, she said, by making the money available only for lawyers with specific vacation plans.
“It went beyond just giving people money because sometimes you don't prioritize yourself and wellness and getting a break from work,” Handley said. “It's why we went this route of vacation and paying for a vacation to really try to get people to take care of themselves.”
Big Law firms have launched a steady stream of new programs and benefits aimed attracting and retaining young talent over the past year, apart from committing to big salary and bonus increases. But Orrick's plan appears to be a new twist.
“It's a terrific idea,” said former Sullivan & Cromwell attorney turned therapist Will Meyerhofer. “There's no better way to respond to lawyer burnout than with some sort of extended break or sabbatical.”
Burnout affects even the best lawyers, he said. And when it does, the best and most critical means to address it is by encouraging them to step away from the firm for a change of surroundings and a chance to refresh without negative repercussions, Meyerhofer said.
“It could help a lot of lawyers in a tangible way,” he said. But he suggested it could be made even better.
“I'm not sure a week is really long enough,” Meyerhofer said. “Frankly, two weeks or a month might be more like it.”
READ MORE:
Amid Concerns Over Lawyer Workloads, US Firms Embrace 'Agility'
As Law Firms Address Mental Health, Many Find the Stakes Are Personal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250