Jenner & Block Defending Powerful Chicago Alderman Ed Burke in Extortion Case
Plenty of the Windy City-based firm's lawyers have experience with cases involving Chicago-style corruption.
January 04, 2019 at 01:16 PM
4 minute read
Jenner & Block's ties to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois run long and deep. Now, the firm is defending one of the most high-profile Chicago politicians to be charged by that office.
The federal government Thursday charged powerful Chicago alderman Edward Burke with attempting to extort a business owner into using the alderman's personal property tax appeals firm. Burke is the longest-tenured alderman in Chicago history, first elected to the City Council in 1969. He faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison if convicted.
The Chicago Tribune said the latest headline-grabbing corruption charge of a local politician represented “arguably one of the biggest fish ever reeled in by the U.S. Attorney's Office.”
Plenty of Jenner & Block attorneys would be a good gauge of that. That includes Charles Sklarsky, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Chicago office who represented Burke at a hearing Thursday in the Dirksen Federal Building and said Thursday his client did not commit extortion.
Sklarsky and a litany of Jenner partners including former chairman Anton Valukas and senior partner Thomas Sullivan were involved in perhaps the most well-known federal prosecution of Chicago government corruption: Operation Greylord. A Jenner & Block spokeswoman confirmed that Valukas is also representing Burke.
Sullivan launched that investigation as the former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and Valukas, holding the same title, concluded the probe that led to roughly 90 convictions of judges, lawyers, deputy sheriffs, police officers and court clerks on a range of charges including conspiracy and bribery. That investigation, made public in 1983, showed that justice was at one time for sale in Chicago—judges were accepting bribes, often from Outfit-connected defendants.
The charge unveiled Thursday against Burke alleged that day-to-day business licenses were being held up in an effort to steer business toward Burke's long-time law firm, Klafter & Burke, which has helped high-profile clients, including President Donald Trump, reduce their property tax burdens.
“The transaction described in the complaint does not make out an extortion or an attempt to extort,” Sklarsky told reporters following Thursday's hearing. “We look forward to a prompt day in court to prove the innocence of Ald. Burke.”
Federal agents received a warrant from the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Chicago to tap Burke's phone, the complaint says. They overheard conversations between Burke and an associate discussing plans to disrupt the remodeling work of a fast food restaurant and to ask the owners of that business to use Burke's law firm and to make contributions to at least one other Chicago politician.
The restaurant involved has been identified in local reports as a Burger King run by a franchisee who the complaint says operates some 162 restaurants in the area.
The complaint says representatives of the restaurant business met with Burke at a local country club to discuss their stalled renovation project. At the lunch meeting, Burke allegedly referenced his property tax firm. The business never hired the law firm.
“I was playing nice with 'em. Never got back,” Burke allegedly said in a conversation with a city employee apparently regarding the company's tax work.
The worker responded, “I'll play as hardball as I can.”
“Okay,” Burke replied, according to the complaint.
After a series of meetings, phone calls and emails, representatives of the business said Dec. 19, 2017, that they would be sending the tax appeals work to Burke's firm. The company received the permit it had been seeking on the same day, the complaint says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
3 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readAI Expected to Transform Legal Field Even More as Technologies Evolve
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250