Munger Tolles Did It. Why Can't You?
The firm has elected eight new partners, and 60 percent of them are women or lawyers of color.
January 07, 2019 at 02:50 PM
5 minute read
If Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is arguably this year's winner of the Dinosaur Award for presenting one of the whitest, most male batch of new partners in Big Law (the firm elected 11 white men and one white woman), Munger, Tolles & Olson might be a top contender in the cool, woke category.
Munger has elected eight new partners, and 60 percent of them are women or lawyers of color. What's more, three of the new partners (Rose Leda Ehler, Laura Lin and Kuruvilla Olasa) took parental leave during the year they were up for partnership—and one of them is a male. The audacity!
Yes, it is 2019, so a diverse crop of new partners, including ones who took time off to bond with their newborns, shouldn't be news. Except, of course, it is.
So the big question: How did an uber-elite firm like Munger Tolles do it? Was this a fluke? And can other firms learn some tricks from the Munger playbook?
First, let's be perfectly clear that Munger is progressive—perhaps radically progressive. Transparency and democracy rules—meaning that even lowly junior associates can see the firm's financials and what everyone (including partners) are making. Plus, associates have voting rights on most matters (though not on partnership decisions). “We try to treat people like owners of the business,” says Sandra Seville Jones, Munger's co-managing partner. “If they want to change something, they have the power to do it. Sometimes it can be chaos with 200 people with different ideas, but that's the beauty of it.”
Sounds too socialist for your shop? Well, stay with me. There are some measures that even uptight, traditional firms can adopt from the Munger model that might help you retain talent and diversify your ranks.
Now, I usually zone out whenever a firm tells me it's “family-friendly” because it's such an overused, hollow term. That said, Munger does seem to take the concept a step further than most firms:
On-site daycare and early education center. This sounds positively European: Open 12 hours a day (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.), the award-winning center (O'Melveny & Meyers and Oaktree Capital Management are also partners) serves infants and toddlers until they're ready to trot off to kindergarten. Rose Leda Ehler, one of Munger's new partners and the mother of a 9-month old, says. “This enables me to have the mental space to work,” adding, “My son loves it and we adore the staff.” Another goodie: Lawyers get 15 days of subsidized backup care.
Generous leave policy (that people use!). Primary caregivers get 18 weeks of fully paid leave after the birth or adoption of a child and non-primary caregivers get six weeks. Though there are other big firms with comparable policies, one difference is that lawyers who take them don't seem to pay a penalty. “It never occurred to me that this would pose a career problem—not for one minute,” says new partner Kuruvilla Olasa about his decision to take six weeks off after the birth of each of his two children. “When I was talking to senior lawyers at the firm back in 2010, male lawyers were taking leave then, too. There's a growing awareness that fathers should bond with their children too.”
Flexibility—not just once a week. It's right on the firm's website that it has “no face time requirement.” But that doesn't mean just working from home. “I wanted to go to India with my child where I grew up, and I worked from there for 12 days,” says Olasa. “People knew it was a priority for me. They trusted me to do my work.” (And to think that Weil, Gotshal & Manges made such a big fuss last fall about letting third-year and more senior associates work from home up to one day a week!)
Much harder to implement is the culture of the firm. “It's more about the attitude,” says new partner Lin, who came back to work two months ago from her second maternity leave. She says that the firm offers “lots of role models” who show that “it's possible to be an excellent lawyer and parent.” That attitude wasn't so typical of other firms, she says: “When I interviewed with New York firms, someone would say to me, 'And she's a mom'—like that's some kind of unicorn.”
So will the day come when firms will adopt more progressive attitudes? “The change in culture will be hard for some firms, because they're wired differently,” says Olasa. “But they will realize they will lose people if they can't be with their families. Firms can step up now or go there kicking and screaming.”
My prediction: Kicking and screaming—loads.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250