Ogletree Deakins Partners With AI Company to Build Better Data
The AmLaw 100 labor and employment firm is making a bet that AI and big data can make its lawyers faster and more insightful.
January 09, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart last April became the first law firm to publicly announce a licensing deal with legal AI firm LegalMation, which generates automated responses to complaints in just a couple minutes.
Now, the Atlanta-founded AmLaw 100 firm will be the lone Big Law labor and employment firm to use the tool, announcing Wednesday it signed an exclusive partnership arrangement to use the LegalMation platform and to build new products from it.
Until now, Ogletree had used the product on employment cases in California, but it will expand that use to Texas, New Jersey and Florida as well as other jurisdictions as they become available on the LegalMation platform, the firm announced. In addition to drawing up answers to complaints, the product also drafts responses to discovery requests.
Through the partnership, Ogletree lawyers will train LegalMation's artificial intelligence system and also help in the development of new auto-generated reports through the system. Those reports could include case analytics, case summaries and other high-volume prelitigation tasks, the firm said.
Patrick DiDomenico, the firm's chief knowledge officer, said the license with LegalMation is intended to help the firm's lawyers spend less time on routine legal tasks such as drawing up answers to complaints. Down the line, he said the tool's ability to capture data on complaints will help its lawyers make more insightful decisions while litigating cases.
“Having access to LegalMation [exclusively] is an obvious benefit,” DiDomenico said. “More importantly, I think it demonstrates the commitment we have to each other. We are both very serious about this partnership. And that is an indicator of how hard we are both going to work to make this mutually beneficial and beneficial to our clients.”
LegalMation, launched in March last year, was co-founded in California by Thomas Suh and Big Law ex-pat James Lee, who also co-founded the litigation boutique LTL Attorneys. The company last year announced a licensing agreement with retail giant Walmart Inc. Suh and Lee have since stepped away from management roles at their firm, which launched in 2003 as a spinoff from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, to focus on LegalMation's expansion.
Lee said the company's product currently works for four types of lawsuits: employment, personal injury, insurance defense and financial services. The long-term goal is to roll out the tool for jurisdictions across the country.
As they work to add jurisdictions, Lee said the company's AI tools will also enable a type of data analysis on complaints that has so far largely eluded the practice of law. The technology can classify up to 2,000 data points on a given complaint, Lee said. That will allow firms, for instance, to compare lawsuits filed by plaintiff's firm, lawyer or jurisdiction.
In the case of wrongful termination claims, Lee said the tool can compare lawsuits based on how long an employee had worked at a company, which can be used as a sign of how serious the case is.
“The biggest challenge in the marketplace today is all the firms and companies have immense data,” Lee said. “The part they don't have is the ability to compare Case A to Case B efficiently and in a way that will give them great insights.”
Comparing cases using LegalMation, Lee said, is “like comparing one Fuji apple's condition to another Fuji apple and then finding relationships.”
DiDomenico, at Ogletree, said the data analysis portion of LegalMation is an exciting development, since it has been difficult to compare cases with one another. Ogletree's data will not be shared with other firms, he said.
“This is one of the first and, I think, most promising tools that can really capture a lot of data that is highly relevant to litigation,” DiDomenico said. “The possibilities are endless in terms of what you can do with that data and how you can analyze it if you have thousands of documents run through this system and millions of data points.”
More Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250