What's In Store for Big Law This Year? Lavish Perks, Thought Leadership and More
The Careerist makes her predictions for what's ahead this year.
January 09, 2019 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
It's that time of the year again when I don my velvet robe and giant hoop earrings to gaze into the future. Here's what I see in the new year:
Associates will have more freedom than ever. Firms will offer more corporate goodies like unlimited vacations and unlimited parental leave. (Two of the country's hardest-working firms, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Susman Godfrey, already do so.) They'll also require less face time in the office. Who cares where you work, how you're doing it or what you look and smell like in the process? Just keep billing at least 2,800 hours a year and you can be as free as a butterfly.
Law firms will offer more lavish perks. Besides picking up your dry-cleaning and buying birthday gifts for your loved ones, firms will extend concierge services to your children and dogs. Yes, they will feed them, potty-train them and kiss them goodnight. (And you thought Latham & Watkins offering free Fed-Ex service for breast milk to nursing lawyer-moms was a big deal!)
Firms will insist on emotional intelligence in associate hiring. Too bad management can't think of a reason why EQ should apply to the partners in their stables.
Firms will brand themselves as thought leaders. Caveat: No one in management has a clue what that means. But, hey, isn't that what those expensive consultants told you to say to distinguish your firm from the pack?
Theories will fly about why women still aren't breaking into the equity partner ranks. Is it because they're too busy having babies (or worried about not having babies)? Is it because they're not pushy enough about client development (or being too pushy)? Are they wearing the wrong clothes, shoes, hairstyles?
Mommy track will still be a dead-end. Despite all the wishing and hoping, women on the mommy track are not going anywhere. That said, we'll hear the occasional story about some lone woman who clawed her way to partnership from a part-time position. It's nice to believe in miracles.
Men and women will not agree about sexual harassment, power, accountability or anything else. Men will continue to think that the system is working well; women, not so much. (Remember, 54 percent of men thought of themselves as “allies” for gender equality, while only 31 percent of women agreed with them, according to an American Bar Association study.) And why shouldn't men think everything is great? I mean, duh, they're doing fine.
Trump University will be reborn as Trump School of Law. Although Trump University was a fail and a fraud, it proved that there are suckers aplenty. So why not sell the Trump J.D. to his beloved “poorly educated”? The degree will be worthless but it'll be a great investment for Trump's friends and family, particularly with Education Secretary Betsy DeVos at the helm. MAGA!
Mike Pence will be the new role model for men. As men get increasingly unnerved by the #MeToo movement, expect the Mike Pence rule to prevail. Yes, that means more men in power will dodge one-on-one meetings or business travel with female colleagues. Expect a more uptight workplace and increased gender segregation on matters.
And yes, it will still be a great time to be a white man in the legal profession and everywhere else. I know you've been worried that clients now demand diverse teams and that the #MeToo era has embolden women to speak out, but chill. I'll go on a limb and predict that white men will still rule Big Law, corporate America and the highest office in the land. Feel better now?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden's Big China Cuts and What They Mean for the Market
Trending Stories
- 1In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 2Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 3The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 4Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 5Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250