How Law Firms Can Harness the Strategic Value of Events
Firms invest considerable resources to host in-person gatherings, but many fall short when it comes to maximizing their strategic value.
January 10, 2019 at 08:49 PM
5 minute read
Despite all of the technological systems available to advance business development efforts, lawyers and clients continue to report that face-to-face interaction is the best way to build relationships and better understand client needs. Firms invest considerable resources to host in-person gatherings, but many fall short when it comes to maximizing their strategic value. Increased demands on time, more restrictive client entertainment policies and a heightened emphasis on budget are raising the bar for measuring success, making it more important than ever for attorneys and organizers to develop a meaningful value proposition that ensures a beneficial experience for everyone.
What Are Your Goals?
Before you consider hosting an event, ask yourself what you hope to achieve. The answer may be to thank clients for their business or celebrate a favorable outcome. Other times the firm may want to connect with alumni or raise the profile of a practice area. Whatever the desired outcome, you cannot determine an appropriate budget or begin to organize without identifying the audience you aim to attract and thinking about your overall goals in relation to that audience.
Keep in mind, not all events are meant to have a large room full of people. In fact, some of the most meaningful exchanges happen in smaller groups. Identify the best format before you focus on the appropriate invitation list. From the outset, attorneys should be prepared to review invite lists to include key contacts and remove those who either may not be interested or may not be a target attendee. Repeatedly using one large, generic mailing list results in a false sense of success by inflating RSVP numbers with guests who may not be quality business development targets. It also drives up costs.
Consider Client Interests
More important than identifying goals for the firm is ensuring that the event is beneficial to the client. Your target audience likely receives invitations from a wide range of industry groups and organizations. What differentiates your event from the others? When everyone's time is at a premium, why should your client prioritize this invitation over others?
Put yourself in the shoes of your client and create an opportunity that offers value and is a good use of their time. Consider educational benefits, networking opportunities and exposure to high-profile speakers, among other factors, as a means to enhance their experience.
A critical part of assessing value lies in understanding clients' restrictions on accepting social invitations. Talk with contacts and carefully review client agreements in order to make good decisions about when and how to entertain (assuming you are permitted to do so at all).
Monitor the Competition
What may seem like a terrific idea becomes less appealing if you discover that your clients already have been invited to the same type of function by another law firm. Before investing time and money on a concept, work strategically with your marketing and business development teams to research competitor activities and recommend event ideas that are ahead of the curve.
Don't Set It and Forget It
When hosting a small party, it is natural to scrutinize the invite list and seating chart and closely monitor cancellations and no-shows. Larger events with bigger invitation and RSVP lists often suffer from lack of attention. Regardless of the size of the event, be sure to request frequent RSVP updates and monitor client responses. Follow up personally with clients who have not yet replied—and be aware of who may have expressed interest but canceled. Even if a client is unable to attend, the invitation is an ideal opportunity to personally connect.
Closely monitor RSVPs and counts to establish the appropriate attorney-to-client ratio for the event. Limit firm attendance to key relationship holders to avoid overwhelming guests with a disproportionate number of attorneys from the firm. While it is difficult to have those internal conversations, remember the goals set for the event and prioritize the interests of the client.
Prior to arriving at the event, attorneys should prepare a mental list of a few people with whom they want to spend time. Also, think about peer-to-peer introductions you can make among attendees to help enhance their networking with other guests. Finally, be sure to identify VIP guests for the marketing or logistics team to assist with facilitating introductions as guests arrive.
Enjoy!
With so much emphasis on strategy, it is easy for attorney hosts to assume that a defined process will zap all of the fun out of the event. To the contrary, a well-organized approach reduces the stress of hosting and helps ensure everyone will enjoy themselves. Clients appreciate the extra effort that goes into a high-caliber event that has been organized with their interests in mind.
Conduct a Post-Event Debrief
When it comes to events, it isn't over when it's over. Determine what, if any, client follow-up is appropriate, and then conduct a candid debrief with your marketing team to evaluate the success of the event. Were goals met? Did attorneys leverage the event to maximize time with clients? Did attorneys solicit feedback from clients? Did costs meet expectations? Examining this information ensures accountability from all stakeholders during the planning process and institutionalizes best practices for future events.
Brooke E. Loucks is a global marketing and communications administrator at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, where she oversees the firm's client educational programs and events. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute readHaynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
3 minute read'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024
- 2January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 3'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 5Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250