But Where Are the Black Partners?
New partner classes include more women and minorities, with one glaring omission.
January 15, 2019 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
Nothing gets firms all hot and bothered than giving one of their competitors favorable air time.
Last week, I wrote about Munger, Tolles & Olsen's crop of new partners, noting that it promoted 60 percent female or people of color. The next day, I heard from a handful of major firms that they, too, elevated new classes with noteworthy percentages of women or diverse partners.
First of all, I am more than happy to publicize these results:
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld promoted 11 lawyers, including four women and three lawyers of color.
- Morrison & Foerster promoted 12 lawyers with an equal number of women and men in the class, including three minorities.
- O'Melveny & Myers promoted nine partners, including four women and two lawyers of colors.
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan promoted 14 lawyers, including seven women and three diverse attorneys—its largest-ever partnership class.
Let me say Mazel Tov to these four firms plus Munger Tolles! Their percentage of new diverse/female partners is commendable, particularly since so few came forward. (Query: Does that mean the rest of Big Law generally have crummy results?)
Indeed, these firms seem to be on a roll. At Akin, three of the 11 new partners took parental leave during the last year—and “all three of them were men,” according to firm spokesman Ben Harris. Moreover, one of the new partners is a woman who “worked primarily on a reduced workload schedule and continues to after being promoted to partner.” And in the last five years, women have represented more than 40 percent of new partners at both Morrison & Foerster and O'Melveny. (It's also worth noting that O'Melveny and Munger Tolles both provide on-site child care facility.)
Larren Nashelsky, chair of Morrison & Foerster, says: “I am proud that in the last five years we have promoted 29 women to partner, representing 48 percent of our total partner promotions.”
All admirable results, except for one glaring omission: black partners. With the very notable (and noticeable) exception of Akin, which promoted a black woman to partner this year, none of the others that touted their diversity records did so.
More distressing is that new black partners also appear absent in firms with huge partnership classes this year. For instance, neither White & Case (41 new partners) nor Jones Day (46 new partners) seems to have elevated any blacks. Women, by contrast, fared quite well at both firms—19 new female partners at White & Case and 22 at Jones Day. And, yes, there were Asians and Hispanics in the mix, too. White & Case did not respond to inquiries about minorities in its new class. Jones Day did not return messages seeking comment.
Sadly, we know from recent studies on diversity in the profession that black equity partners are rare. The National Association for Law Placement's latest data shows that black partner rates have barely changed since 2009, and the rate of black associates still hasn't recovered since that recession. Another study by Vault/Minority Corporate Counsel Association finds that the rate of black lawyers promoted to partner last year—2.3 percent—was actually the lowest to date. And if the new partner announcements so far are any indication, this year could be just as depressing or worse.
As I said, it's a relief that there's finally some movement on the women and diversity front (for some). But doesn't that make the lack of progress for black lawyers even more conspicuous? Sometimes, I get the impression that we just don't want to talk about this problem.
Anyway, I hope I've simply just missed a bunch of new black partners announcements at major firms. Or maybe some firms are just holding back to surprise us.
In the meantime, if you know any new black partners on the horizon, give me a shout. Because it's definitely newsworthy.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250