Data Snapshot: The Boston Big Law Boom
An analysis shows that Beantown's legal boom has been led by Am Law 200 firms.
January 22, 2019 at 12:05 AM
3 minute read
Clarification (2019-03-01): The fiscal years in the story and charts below refer to the year the data were published by The American Lawyer and The National Law Journal. Those figures pertain to the prior fiscal year for the firms included in Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 indexes.
For several years Boston has been seen as a go-to destination for many Big Law firms, and a new analysis by The American Lawyer shows that the expansion effort has been led by Am Law 200 firms looking to establish a foothold in Beantown.
Since 2013, the total number of Am Law 200-ranked firms with at least one office in the Boston metro area has increased by more than 16 percent — or eight firms — according to an analysis of 2013-2018 data from ALM Intellligence's Legal Compass. By contrast, at either end of the same five-year span, the number of National Law Journal 350 index-ranked firms was static at 12.
Five years ago, there were 49 Am Law 200 firms with offices in the Boston metro; the number remained fairly constant until 2016, when the city started experiencing a Big Law boom.
In May 2017, Kirkland & Ellis opened an office in the city's Bay Back neighborhood. Hogan Lovells followed suit, merging with local litigation boutique Collora. Womble Bond Dickinson opened an office with a trio of McCarter & English IP partners. In 2018, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan opened an office in Boston with three of its IP litigators, while Washington, D.C.-based Arent Fox merged with local 55-lawyer firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund.
By the end of 2018, the city boasted 57 Am Law 200 ranked firms.
The rate of growth is similar to that in other markets, like Houston and Philadelphia, which have also experienced an uptick in the number of Am Law 200 firms since 2013.
Despite the entrance of out of town firms into the legal market, firms with Boston roots still have the largest arsenal of Big Law talent.
Goodwin Procter, which was founded in Boston in 1912, boasts the most partners of any Am Law 200 firm in the Boston metro area with 151 partners. Ropes & Gray, one of the first law firms founded in the city, had the second largest, with 121 partners. While Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo was a close third with 120 partners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
As Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute read
Versatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
