Law Firm Sales Push Growth of Alternative Services Providers, Report Says
Large law firms are increasingly turning to ALSPs, even if their concerns about the quality of the services remain.
January 29, 2019 at 05:30 AM
5 minute read
The market for alternative legal service providers grew at an annualized rate of nearly 13 percent from 2015 to 2017, driven by larger-than-expected sales growth to corporate legal departments and law firms, according to a report released Tuesday by Thomson Reuters.
The market for so-called ALSPs was estimated at $10.7 billion in 2017, the report says. The percentage of large law firms that use ALSPs for at least one service, including e-discovery, document review, legal research or litigation support, rose to 87 percent in 2018, up from 56 percent in 2016. At legal departments, that figure rose to 74 percent from 60 percent.
While those growth rates exceeded the expectations of a comparable report two years ago, the latest report predicts the market has even more significant growth ahead. It says ALSP owners expect to increase at a 25 percent annualized growth rate “over the next few years.” At that pace, the market would reach $20 billion in sales in three years.
For comparison, the $10.7 billion market in 2017 is slightly smaller than the combined revenue of the four largest firms in the Am Law 100. A $20 billion market would be about the size of the 10 largest Am Law 100 firms.
Large law firms said they were increasingly turning to ALSPs for strategic business reasons, even if their concerns about the quality of ALSP services remain. For instance, 53 percent of firms said using ALSPs could help them expand and retain client relationships, up from 44 percent two years ago. Similarly, 55 percent of firms said their traditional business model was being challenged by ALSPs, while 44 percent said so two years ago. And 39 percent of firms said they are facing increased pressure from clients to use ALSPs, up from 18 percent two years ago.
“For law firms, the pressure is on to win clients, to compete head-to-head and to improve bottom lines,” said Eric Laughlin, managing director of Thomson Reuters' legal managed services division, which is an ALSP. “And ALSPs are seen as part of the solution to that pressure.”
Still, it is unclear if large law firms are embedding ALSP use in their business model or using their services for particular matters at the request of clients.
“From the data, we can show that most law firms are using ALSPs in some way, but we can't yet tell that they have invested in ALSPs,” Laughlin said. “Less than 20 percent of firms have a captive [legal process outsourcing business]. So the rest of the usage is potentially experimentation, partnering with ALSPs or using them as a vendor.”
Thomson Reuters partnered with The Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at The Georgetown University Law Center and the University of Oxford's Saïd Business School to prepare the report, which included surveys of law firms and legal departments.
The market for ALSPs continued to be highly fragmented. It includes captive legal process outsource businesses within law firms, the Big Four's legal services arms, independent LPOs, managed services businesses and staffing services. The largest of those categories is independent LPOs such as Consilio LLC, DTI and Integreon Inc., which the report estimated to bring in $7.4 billion in revenue.
The estimated revenue of the Big Four's legal services business grew from $900 million in the 2016 survey to $1.2 billion in the latest report.
Companies including UnitedLex, Elevate and Thomson Reuters make up a “managed services” component of the ALSP market that had the largest growth rate of all divisions, increasing from an estimated $250 million in revenue two years ago to $700 million in the latest report.
The report also included some data on law firms' experience competing with the Big Four. Twenty percent of large law firms said they competed against a member of the Big Four in the past year for legal work, and 23 percent said they had a client use a Big Four firm for work the law firm expected to win.
U.S. corporations are also a large driver of ALSP growth. The percentage of corporations using ALSPs for particular services doubled in two years for services including litigation and investigation support (38 percent in 2018, up from 11 percent in 2016); legal research services (34 percent from 17 percent); document review (32 percent from 11 percent); and e-discovery (28 percent from 13 percent).
Corporations did not report as large of increases in their reasons for using ALSPs as law firms did, but still expressed strong demand for them.
For instance, 23 percent of corporations said they were encouraging their law firms to use ALSPs, up from 18 percent two years ago. And 27 percent said they were facing increased internal pressure to use ALSPs to decrease legal spending, while 22 percent said so two years ago.
“This all points to the fact that ALSPs are a more stable, mature presence in the legal ecosystem that clearly has high growth in front of it,” Laughlin said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250