Law Firm Sales Push Growth of Alternative Services Providers, Report Says
Large law firms are increasingly turning to ALSPs, even if their concerns about the quality of the services remain.
January 29, 2019 at 05:30 AM
5 minute read
The market for alternative legal service providers grew at an annualized rate of nearly 13 percent from 2015 to 2017, driven by larger-than-expected sales growth to corporate legal departments and law firms, according to a report released Tuesday by Thomson Reuters.
The market for so-called ALSPs was estimated at $10.7 billion in 2017, the report says. The percentage of large law firms that use ALSPs for at least one service, including e-discovery, document review, legal research or litigation support, rose to 87 percent in 2018, up from 56 percent in 2016. At legal departments, that figure rose to 74 percent from 60 percent.
While those growth rates exceeded the expectations of a comparable report two years ago, the latest report predicts the market has even more significant growth ahead. It says ALSP owners expect to increase at a 25 percent annualized growth rate “over the next few years.” At that pace, the market would reach $20 billion in sales in three years.
For comparison, the $10.7 billion market in 2017 is slightly smaller than the combined revenue of the four largest firms in the Am Law 100. A $20 billion market would be about the size of the 10 largest Am Law 100 firms.
Large law firms said they were increasingly turning to ALSPs for strategic business reasons, even if their concerns about the quality of ALSP services remain. For instance, 53 percent of firms said using ALSPs could help them expand and retain client relationships, up from 44 percent two years ago. Similarly, 55 percent of firms said their traditional business model was being challenged by ALSPs, while 44 percent said so two years ago. And 39 percent of firms said they are facing increased pressure from clients to use ALSPs, up from 18 percent two years ago.
“For law firms, the pressure is on to win clients, to compete head-to-head and to improve bottom lines,” said Eric Laughlin, managing director of Thomson Reuters' legal managed services division, which is an ALSP. “And ALSPs are seen as part of the solution to that pressure.”
Still, it is unclear if large law firms are embedding ALSP use in their business model or using their services for particular matters at the request of clients.
“From the data, we can show that most law firms are using ALSPs in some way, but we can't yet tell that they have invested in ALSPs,” Laughlin said. “Less than 20 percent of firms have a captive [legal process outsourcing business]. So the rest of the usage is potentially experimentation, partnering with ALSPs or using them as a vendor.”
Thomson Reuters partnered with The Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at The Georgetown University Law Center and the University of Oxford's Saïd Business School to prepare the report, which included surveys of law firms and legal departments.
The market for ALSPs continued to be highly fragmented. It includes captive legal process outsource businesses within law firms, the Big Four's legal services arms, independent LPOs, managed services businesses and staffing services. The largest of those categories is independent LPOs such as Consilio LLC, DTI and Integreon Inc., which the report estimated to bring in $7.4 billion in revenue.
The estimated revenue of the Big Four's legal services business grew from $900 million in the 2016 survey to $1.2 billion in the latest report.
Companies including UnitedLex, Elevate and Thomson Reuters make up a “managed services” component of the ALSP market that had the largest growth rate of all divisions, increasing from an estimated $250 million in revenue two years ago to $700 million in the latest report.
The report also included some data on law firms' experience competing with the Big Four. Twenty percent of large law firms said they competed against a member of the Big Four in the past year for legal work, and 23 percent said they had a client use a Big Four firm for work the law firm expected to win.
U.S. corporations are also a large driver of ALSP growth. The percentage of corporations using ALSPs for particular services doubled in two years for services including litigation and investigation support (38 percent in 2018, up from 11 percent in 2016); legal research services (34 percent from 17 percent); document review (32 percent from 11 percent); and e-discovery (28 percent from 13 percent).
Corporations did not report as large of increases in their reasons for using ALSPs as law firms did, but still expressed strong demand for them.
For instance, 23 percent of corporations said they were encouraging their law firms to use ALSPs, up from 18 percent two years ago. And 27 percent said they were facing increased internal pressure to use ALSPs to decrease legal spending, while 22 percent said so two years ago.
“This all points to the fact that ALSPs are a more stable, mature presence in the legal ecosystem that clearly has high growth in front of it,” Laughlin said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250