"It's Not About Dumping White, Male Lawyers:" Signatory to Open Letter Explains Why This Diversity Push Is Different
Turo CLO Michelle Fang says giving more work to diverse lawyers doesn't have to mean firing existing, trusted advisers. It's about building new trusted relationships.
January 30, 2019 at 08:09 AM
4 minute read
Michelle Fang and 169 general counsel at other corporations were riding a high Sunday when news of their open letter to law firms demanding more diversity was met with great praise and excitement.
But one of her comments in a New York Times article about the profession's diversity problem caught the attention of the likes of me. She said she would have a hard time firing the white, male lawyer she has long worked with and trusted if his firm weren't diverse enough. I seized on that as emblematic of why the problem of diversity in law is so difficult to fix.
There is more to the story, however, Fang argued from the hospital, where she had taken a break from being with a sick family member to speak to reporters about these issues that she says are so important to keep at the forefront of the industry's proverbial mind.
What she also had said as part of her quote on that white, male lawyer and his firm, was that she wouldn't have to worry about firing him because he and his firm are actively working to promote women and minorities. In fact, that lawyer asked Fang last year to get one of his female associates on a big matter so that Fang could then credibly write a partnership recommendation letter for the associate.
“I'm not living in that hypothetical world,” Fang said of what she would have to do if the firm wasn't diverse enough.
But still, I asked her how the letter she and her colleagues penned would do more to effect change than the ones that came before it. As one op-ed from a black Big Law partner explains, there is significant skepticism that it will. Fang said she is optimistic this will be different, in part because of the environment we're living in right now, including the #MeToo era.
“There's been a lot more permission for people to speak out about injustices they face,” Fang said.
And the general counsel's promise to divert work away from firms that aren't doing more is a real effort to “vote with their pocketbooks,” Fang said. She said she hopes these GCs will arm the attorneys and diversity and inclusion officers in law firms who care about these issues with proof that clients will take business elsewhere.
But it isn't all about ending existing relationships, Fang said. She thinks firms that have historically struggled in the area of diversity are working to change, too.
“This isn't about dumping white, male lawyers,” Fang said.
She acknowledges she still has to give her most important matters to those trusted advisers she has long used, white, male or not. Even when trusted relationships exist, she said, there are always new matters that require new lawyers to work on them. That's where GCs can really effectuate change, she said.
For example, Fang's company, Turo, had to move its trademark portfolio recently, so Fang sought recommendations from her network of general counsel. She chose a firm where two women would oversee the portfolio. She also needed a new firm to help with some smaller litigation matters. She went back to that network for recommendations and chose a woman-owned firm.
“So, yes, I'm not going to ditch some fantastic lawyer because he's a white male,” Fang said. “He's great and earned my trust.”
But she will spend her company's money on ensuring new lawyers coming into the fold reflect the diversity she wants to see.
“It's not just talk, it's real action,” Fang said,
I asked if giving the smaller matters to diverse lawyers while saving the big, sometimes career-making matters for the old guard was perpetuating the problem. Fang doesn't see it that way.
“It is absolutely true that small matters turn into big matters, and that is how you build trust,” so that the GC wants to hire a lawyer for the bigger matters, Fang said.
Diversity and inclusion efforts aside, she said, that is how all young lawyers build their practices. And when she and 169 of her colleagues go to hire those lawyers, they are focused now more than ever on ensuring the hires are diverse. It is different than it was 10 years ago when similar calls to action were made, Fang said.
“This is about the world we want to live in,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 3People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
- 4UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
- 5Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250