Ex-Shkreli Lawyer Suspended From SEC Following Fraud Conspiracy Conviction
While Even Greebel serves out his sentence, the SEC and a court have suspended Greebel.
January 31, 2019 at 05:43 PM
4 minute read
Evan Greebel, a former Katten Muchin Rosenman partner convicted of conspiring to commit fraud with pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, has lost his ability to appear before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The order follows a New York court's decision in early January to suspend Greebel from practicing law.
In an order Thursday, the SEC suspended Greebel, 45, from appearing or practicing before the commission. The suspension was automatically set off by Greebel's December 2017 conviction on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud.
The SEC's order cites the conviction and an 18-month prison sentence handed down in August against Greebel. Prosecutors accused the lawyer of helping former Retrophin Inc. CEO Martin Shkreli improperly use company assets to pay off debts owed to investors in a pair of hedge funds that Shkreli started.
Greebel's work for Retrophin took place when he was at Katten. By the time of his arrest in December 2015, however, he was practicing law at Kaye Scholer, from which he resigned soon after. In addition to the prison term, Greebel was ordered to pay more than $10.4 million in restitution to Retrophin.
Before Greebel's conviction in Brooklyn federal court, a separate fraud trial against Shkreli ended with a guilty verdict, and the former pharmaceutical executive received a seven-year prison sentence.
While Thursday's SEC order suspends Greebel from appearing before the commission, he is allowed under the regulator's rules to later apply for reinstatement. If he manages to overturn his criminal conviction with an appeal, the SEC would automatically reinstate Greebel.
Contacted for comment Thursday, Reed Brodsky of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, who defended Greebel in the criminal trial, noted that the former Katten partner is challenging his conviction at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
“We believe in Evan's appeal and hope that the Second Circuit will recognize the jury instructions holding outside lawyers for a public company liable for the CEO's deceit were flawed and his conviction should be vacated,” Brodsky said in an email.
John Williams of Williams & Connolly is leading Greebel's appeal.
Although he's challenging the conviction, Greebel declined to seek bail pending his appeal and agreed to self-report to begin his prison term. In an Aug. 24 letter, his lawyers explained that Greebel made that decision so he could start and finish any prison time as early as possible, and return to life with his wife and three young children.
In the appeal, Greebel's lawyers have argued that his conviction came after jurors were given a faulty set of instructions and the trial court judge excluded key expert witness testimony.
“The overbroad and unclear instructions given in this case invited the jury to convict Mr. Greebel for conduct that was not a crime,” Greebel's appellate lawyers wrote to the Second Circuit in a Dec. 21 brief.
Greebel's jury instruction argument recently received some support from a group of legal ethics and professional responsibility experts who filed an amicus brief Monday.
Without taking a position on Greebel's guilt or innocence, they argued that the trial court judge was not specific enough when describing the lawyer's fiduciary duty to disclose information under the attorney-client relationship. The ethics experts wrote that the relevant jury instructions “did not identify to whom the lawyer owes the duty to disclose and did not identify the scope of any such disclosure.”
Greebel has been suspended from practicing law in New York. Issuing the interim suspension Jan. 3, a panel of the Appellate Division, Second Department, wrote that Greebel's disciplinary proceeding would be put on hold while he serves out his prison term and directs Greebel to inform the court once he's released.
The order was signed by Justices Alan Scheinkman, William Mastro, Reinaldo Rivera, Mark Dillon and John Leventhal.
Read More:
Ex-Big Law Partner Gets 18 Months in Prison for Stock Fraud Scheme
Jury Finds Former Martin Shkreli Attorney Guilty in Stock Scheme
Kaye Scholer Partner, Pharma Exec Plead Not Guilty to Fraud Charges
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250