More Evidence Rolls In: Law Firms Boosted Revenues, Profits in 2018
The second half of the Am Law 100 performed nearly as well as the top 50, according to Wells Fargo. Growth for the Second Hundred, while positive, still lagged significantly.
February 01, 2019 at 01:24 PM
4 minute read
Law firm lenders at Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc. have been predicting for months that 2018 would turn out to be a post-recession high mark for the industry. On Thursday Wells Fargo finally revealed some full-year numbers, and they didn't disappoint.
The Wells Fargo “year-end check-in,” featuring survey data from 150 law firms primarily in the Am Law 200, reported average revenue growth of 5.9 percent and average net income growth of 7.6 percent, the strongest numbers since before the Great Recession.
“The big differentiator was that in 2018, for the first time in a really long time, what drove revenue was more than just rate increases,” said Joseph Mendola, senior director of sales with the Wells Fargo Private Bank Legal Specialty Group. “It was the combination of rate increases and increases in demand.”
Wells Fargo saw demand across all firms, measured by total billable hours logged, rise 2.3 percent over the previous year, ahead of the 1.3 percent growth of 2017. Meanwhile, rates increased steadily in the 4 to 6 percent range.
Break down the numbers between the Am Law 100 and the Second Hundred, however, and the firms in the latter grouping continue to have grounds for concern. While demand grew among the Am Law 100 by 3.9 percent, compared to 2.1 percent in 2017, for the Second Hundred, growth was just 0.1 percent. Still, this figure was a jump from the 0.8 percent decline from the previous year.
Contrary to other recent findings suggesting that the Am Law 50 were pulling away from the rest of the pack, the Wells Fargo survey revealed that growth in the Am Law 50-100 was almost as strong. While the strongest revenue gains were in the top 50, at 7.7 percent, the figure for the second 50 was not far behind, at 6.5 percent. Meanwhile, the second 50 actually grew net income at a higher rate: 8.2 percent compared to 8 percent for the top 50.
Mendola credited the robust performance of the second 50 to growth in litigation and other counter-cyclical practices, noting that the Am Law 50 has a bigger concentration of firms that are more heavily weighted towards transactional work.
“The deal business was still alive and well in 2018, but I think [demand] was more balanced in 2018 than 2017,” he said.
Still, stratification between the elite firms and the rest of the market remains a reality, Mendola noted.
“There's certainly a segment of firms that are identified by clients as 'go-to' firms for certain matters. It's a segment that has become more price insensitive,” he said. “The brand in that type of firms attracts deal work at rates that are significant different from what you see as you go down market.”
In spite of some predictions of dark clouds forming over the wider economy, thanks to uncertainties over international trade and the consequences of the record-setting government shutdown, the survey indicates that 2019 will start well for law firms.
Just as in 2018, firms reported beginning this year with a strong inventory level, and in all market sectors, firms forecast revenue growth for the year: 5.9 percent in the Am Law 100 and 3.5 percent in the second hundred.
“They're not huge increases,” Mendola said. “But participants are feeling positive.”
|Read More:
Best Year in a Decade for Law Firms? Maybe, But Not for Everyone
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250