Ohio's Porter Wright Enters Chicago Via Merger With 17-Lawyer Firm
The Am Law 200 firm, through the merger, has opened its eighth location in a strategy to focus on mid-market legal services in the Midwest.
February 01, 2019 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
Columbus, Ohio-based Porter Wright Morris & Arthur has entered the Chicago legal market thanks to a merger with 17-lawyer Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd, the firms announced Thursday.
For Porter Wright, an Am Law 200 firm that brought in $110.5 million in revenue in 2017, the opening of its eighth office is part of a strategy to provide the full range of legal services to mid-market companies throughout the Midwest, the firm's managing partner Robert Tannous said in an interview. The merger took effect Friday.
In 2017, 190-lawyer Porter Wright followed its Midwest expansion plan into Pittsburgh, where the firm now has 14 lawyers. The more recent expansion is also an attempt to buck the firm's dwindling head count and stagnant revenue. In 2008, the firm's 251 lawyers brought in $121.5 million in gross revenue, according to data from ALM Intelligence.
“Our growth plan has really been to focus on the Midwest, and we've always looked at Chicago as a place we wanted to move into,” Tannous said. “It was a place we felt would help us expand our brand and opportunities. This is a culmination of a plan we've been looking at for quite some time.”
Butler Rubin was founded in 1980 by a breakaway group of four partners from Winston & Strawn and has since focused on complex financial industry litigation and insurance litigation. Its work has swung from cases involving the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, the Enron Corp. scandal, asbestos, mortgage-backed securities fraud and, more recently, opioid tort claims.
Prior to the merger, the firm had been in the market to add lateral partners, Robert Hermes, its managing partner said in an interview. The firm's founding partners had all retired by the end of 2017, Hermes said. Butler Rubin and Porter Wright were introduced by Major, Lindsey & Africa, which both firms had retained individually, Tannous and Hermes said.
“I was impressed with the fact that Porter Wright had a good vision of itself,” Hermes said. “They really perceive the firm and want to grow the firm to become the law firm for mid-market companies in the Midwest. And that, to me, is a real concept. That is a real idea. And the economic capital of the Midwest is Chicago, so they need to be here to do that.”
Tannous said Butler Rubin was an attractive fit for Porter Wright because its litigation practice will be a new capability to offer the firm's existing clients. Porter Wright's ERISA group would be particularly well fit in cross-selling Butler Rubin's litigation practice, Hermes said. Butler Rubin doesn't offer that practice, but its financial services clients could be in the market for it, Hermes said.
“Our practice areas are mutually exclusive of each other, so it's a nice fit,” Tannous said. “We give them a much deeper, bigger platform. They give us a new practice area where they are internationally known. It gives us a platform to grow our client base and provide additional services to our existing clients.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
- 2White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
- 33 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 4Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
- 5Texas Supreme Court to Review "Implied" Performance Controversy in Oil-Gas Leases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250