Wilson Sonsini Launches Software Developer Subsidiary to Automate Legal Services
The Silicon Valley-based firm wants to automate parts of its work to attract a broader swathe of clientele.
February 05, 2019 at 05:30 AM
5 minute read
Aiming to attract a broader mix of clients, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on Tuesday became one of the first Am Law 100 firms to formally launch a software development business.
The Silicon Valley-based firm has launched a subsidiary called SixFifty, named after the firm's address and area code in Palo Alto. Its first automated legal product, launching this spring, will draft documents for compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act, which takes effect in January 2020.
Beyond that, SixFifty is building out a legal services automation platform that will ultimately provide services for both companies and consumers, said Douglas Clark, Wilson Sonsini's managing partner. SixFifty, like most automated legal services, will not provide legal advice.
“We're not trying to replace ourselves,” Clark said in an interview. “We're trying to help clients access sophisticated legal knowledge more efficiently.”
Wilson Sonsini's subsidiary is an early example of the various approaches law firms may take as they slowly implement technology into their business models. Chapman and Cutler, a Chicago-based Am Law 200 firm, last year became one of the first firms to sell a piece of software that was designed in-house at a law firm. Meanwhile, Atrium Law, a start-up funded by Silicon Valley venture capitalists, has developed a two-pronged business model more akin to a subsidiary that pairs a software development company with a more traditional law firm.
SixFifty has not received outside investment, Clark said, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wilson Sonsini, which in 2017 had revenue of $797 million and profits per equity partner of about $2.2 million. The subsidiary is funded through the firm's balance sheet, Clark said.
SixFifty is led by Kimball Parker, who previously founded an innovation subsidiary at Salt Lake City-based Parsons Behle & Latimer that developed an automation tool to draft compliance documents for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Parker also oversees the LawX legal design lab at Brigham Young University's J. Reuben Clark Law School, which garnered attention for a website its students developed to help litigants fight debt collection cases without a lawyer.
Lincoln Porter, who worked with Parker on both those projects, has also joined SixFifty as chief information officer and chief technology officer.
The GDPR tool Parker helped develop at Parsons Behle sold an initial set of compliance documents for about $10,000, which Parker at the time said was about 10 percent of what those documents might cost to be completed without the technology.
Clark said Parker's previous success with the GDPR tool was “an important proof of concept,” but that SixFifty's approach was “something very unique and special with CCPA,” the California privacy regulation.
For his part, Parker said he was attracted to the partnership with Wilson Sonsini because of the quality of legal advice the firm's lawyers can offer and bake into their automated products.
For instance, the firm's privacy and data protection practice that is helping to develop the CCPA documents includes Lydia Parnes, the former director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the Federal Trade Commission; Chris Olsen, the former assistant director of the FTC's Division of Privacy and Identity Protection; and Beth George, former deputy general counsel to the U.S. Department of Defense.
“What consumers want is the efficiency of automation and machines but with the expertise and judgment of a human behind it,” Parker said. “And so the future of the law, to me, is this human-machine mix. And what makes this really interesting is I'm confident we can build a very good machine, and Wilson Sonsini is the best human expertise in this field.”
The CCPA, which gives customers new levels of control over how businesses use or acquire their personal data, is anticipated to impact more than 500,000 companies in the U.S., according to an analysis by the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Most of those companies are small or mid-sized businesses, which may not be part of the high-end clientele Wilson Sonsini typically serves. Porter said those businesses would be in the sweet spot of SixFifty's offering.
“There are millions of businesses and people who would love to have [Wilson Sonsini's] expertise at their disposal,” Parker said. “And we thought we can take the expertise of Wilson lawyers, which is as good as anywhere in the world, and we can automate some of it to make it available to more businesses and people. And that is so exciting.”
Clients of the subsidiary don't necessarily have to be Wilson Sonsini clients, Parker and Clark said. But their hope is that some clients who use the automated SixFifty service will also use Wilson Sonsini's lawyers for legal advice.
Clark said he was not concerned that automating legal work would cannibalize what lawyers have traditionally done by hand.
“My view, and this could be just a function of what I've done for nearly 30 years, is that the judgment and expertise [lawyers] bring on complex matters … will never be automated and will never be supplanted by machine learning,” Clark said. “There are many functions, however, within the ambit of what law firms have traditionally done that can be made so much more efficient by using technology and making it more available to clients and prospects.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250