Litigation Upstart Opens in DC With ITC Leader From Finnegan
Less than six months after it was launched by a group of McKool Smith alums in Atlanta, New York and Silicon Valley, Reichman Jorgensen has landed in the nation's capital with the addition of IP litigator Christine Lehman.
February 06, 2019 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Reichman Jorgensen, a bicoastal boutique firm started in October by a group of former McKool Smith litigators, has expanded into Washington, D.C., hiring seasoned patent trial lawyer Christine Lehman as the new office's managing partner.
Lehman comes to Reichman Jorgensen after 20 years at Finnegan, Henderson, Farrabow, Garrett & Dunner, where she led that firm's International Trade Commission litigation group and chaired its pro bono committee. She's an experienced patent litigator with a specialty in cases at the ITC, where she served as an investigative attorney early in her career.
In a statement on Tuesday announcing the new hire and office opening, Reichman Jorgensen's name partners—Courtland Reichman and Sarah Jorgensen—touted Lehman's experience as a boon for the early-stage boutique. Reichman Jorgensen launched with a 13-lawyer group in Atlanta, New York and Silicon Valley that decamped from McKool Smith.
The boutique focuses on commercial and intellectual property litigation, and has also struck a strategic alliance with Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick to staff and pitch larger cases.
The firm's founders said Lehman's hire fits with Reichman Jorgensen's broader goal of attracting top talent and maintaining true diversity. With the addition of Lehman, women lawyers comprise the majority of the boutique's ownership, according to Reichman Jorgensen.
“We believe that elite talent wins cases, and Christine, as a star lawyer with a sterling reputation, certainly fits the bill,” said Reichman, who serves as the boutique's managing partner. “Christine's arrival expands our national footprint and bolsters our patent litigation practice, including our capabilities before the ITC, a venue in which our clients have increased needs.”
While Lehman has an active ITC practice, she's also experienced in patent litigation that plays out in federal district courts and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and she has served as global oversight counsel in patent disputes that spread to jurisdictions outside the U.S.
Her cases have spanned several industries, including disputes that involve medical devices, pharmaceuticals, lighting technology and even trampolines. Among other past work, she represented heavy machinery manufacturer Caterpillar Inc. in an ITC dispute against a competitor related to road construction technology, according to her new firm.
Lehman said in an interview on Wednesday that, while Finnegan made her the “the lawyer I am today,” she was drawn to the economic model Reichman Jorgensen has adopted. When the firm launched, its leaders stressed that they would eschew hourly billing and instead use alternative fee structures.
“It was just a chance to do something totally different. We all know that the billable hour is a problem,” said Lehman, later adding that more and more, clients are looking for their outside lawyers to take alternative billing approaches.
Reichman Jorgensen's founders also committed early on to paying associates above the top rates set by Big Law market leaders such as Cravath, Swaine & Moore. Lehman said on Wednesday that the firm's newly launched Washington office will likely expand in the near future with associate hires.
She also noted Reichman Jorgensen's focus on gender and racial diversity, a factor that held particular value to Lehman, who studied engineering in college and has spent her legal career focused on patent litigation, fields where men tend to dominate. She said the prevalence of women litigators at Finnegan was one of the factors that drew her to that firm 20 years ago, and she's excited to now move to Reichman Jorgensen, where she can continue working on patent cases within a firm that's majority owned by women.
“I really never dreamed I'd be in that kind of position,” she said.
|Read More:
Litigation Boutique Spins Off From McKool Smith, Promising Innovative Model
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250