Civil Rights Lawyer Faked Cancer to Delay Cases, Illinois Bar Authorities Say
Bar authorities claim a former lawyer at Chicago's Loevy & Loevy lied about having stomach cancer and then lied about having a son who suffered from the same disease.
February 11, 2019 at 03:12 PM
5 minute read
Bar disciplinary authorities in Illinois have accused a former lawyer at Chicago civil rights firm Loevy & Loevy of repeatedly lying about having stomach cancer, starting as an excuse for his results on the LSAT exam and, later, as a purported reason for delaying case deadlines.
The attorney, Vincenzo “Vince” Field, also allegedly made similar claims involving a supposedly ill son or foster son. In fact, bar authorities said, Field never had stomach cancer, nor did he have a son or foster child, let alone one with the same kind of stomach cancer he falsely claimed to have himself.
The Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission outlined the allegations against Field on Friday in an amended complaint, which followed an initial disciplinary complaint in March. The commission seeks discipline “as is warranted,” but doesn't ask for a specific form of punishment.
Beyond the phony disease, Field is also accused of deceiving former colleagues at Loevy & Loevy, a 38-lawyer civil rights and plaintiffs firm focused on police misconduct and whistleblower cases, by allegedly making up the name and email of a purported expert witness. Field falsely told his colleagues he had retained the supposed expert under a flat-fee arrangement in connection with a specific case. But later, Field informed his colleagues that the fictional expert would have to back out because his daughter had been struck by a car and seriously injured while riding her bike, according to bar authorities.
On June 19, Field's lawyer in the disciplinary case, Mary Robinson of Robinson Law Group in Chicago, filed an answer to the original disciplinary complaint. The answer admits many of Field's false statements about the supposed illness but denies some claims that he intentionally misled others. His lawyer argued that while Field never had stomach cancer, he did suffer from depression, which played a role in his deception.
Field “was ashamed to admit that he suffered from mental illness,” his answer said.
Robinson did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment on Monday, and Field could not be reached. Jonathan Loevy, who founded Loevy & Loevy after an early stint at Sidley Austin, also did not respond to a request for comment. Field is no longer with the firm after joining it in 2012, according to a June 2018 federal court filing in one of Loevy & Loevy's cases.
The amended disciplinary complaint details the lawyer's education and career background starting in 1998, when he graduated from McGill University in Montreal, Canada. He took the LSAT for the first time in December 2005, scoring a 158 out of a possible 180. He later used that score while applying to the University of Chicago Law School, but he was denied admission for the 2006 entering class.
Field took the exam a second time in September 2006, this time scoring a 173. He again applied to the University of Chicago, including a personal statement and an addendum that sought to explain gaps in his academic record, according to the disciplinary complaint. Field wrote that he was diagnosed in 1999 with a form of stomach cancer, leiomyosarcoma, that required him to undergo several surgeries to remove tumors, radiation therapy and “countless” small procedures to deal with gastric bleeding.
He also cited the disease for his original LSAT results. Field wrote in his application that when he first took the exam, he had recently undergone a surgery and was continuing to receive radiation therapy. The law school admitted Field on his second application, but the bar complaint alleges that Field never had the disease or any of the medical procedures he described.
Field's alleged misconduct didn't stop after he graduated law school and was admitted to the bar in 2011, according his disciplinary case. He engaged in a similar pattern of deception at various points throughout his career, allegedly misleading opposing counsel and the courts in at least three civil rights cases. The disciplinary complaint also accuses Field of giving misleading answers during a disciplinary proceeding.
In one of the civil rights cases, which started in November 2014, Field allegedly sought an extension on an upcoming discovery deadline after claiming that he had missed time from work “dealing with a serious medical issue (having tumors removed from my abdomen and stomach).”
Another civil rights case that began in 2013 led to a different set of allegedly false statements from Field, according to the disciplinary complaint. Ahead of a July 30, 2016, deadline to complete depositions, Field on July 19 emailed the federal prosecutors on the other side of the case to say he was dealing with a family emergency that would stop him from deposing a defendant in the lawsuit.
In follow-up notes to opposing lawyers, Field wrote that he and his fiancee had fostered children for several years. He explained that a foster son of his suffered from leiomyosarcoma, the same type of stomach cancer Field had referenced in his law school application, and that the child needed to have surgery to remove a small part of his stomach and gastrointestinal tract.
About a month later, in August 2016, Field recanted his claims and admitted in a court filing that he had fabricated the family emergency story, though he also argued that he had never done such a thing before.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250