Profits and Revenue Soar at Nixon Peabody
As its revenue surpassed a half-billion dollars for the first time, Nixon Peabody's profits per partner surged to $1.5 million.
February 13, 2019 at 03:50 PM
4 minute read
|
Driven by a strong year in its transactional practice and some high-profile litigation matters, Nixon Peabody reported double-digit percentage increases in revenue and profit in 2018 over the prior year—including a more than 35 percent jump in partner profits.
The firm, which has the largest of 17 offices in Boston, posted gross revenue of more than $530.6 million in the 2018 fiscal year, a 12 percent uptick over 2017. With 607 lawyers at Nixon Peabody, the firm's top line results amounted to revenue per lawyer of $874,000—an 11.1 percent increase compared with the prior year's RPL results of $787,000.
“2018 was a banner year for us; we were up in a major way,” said Nixon Peabody CEO and managing partner Andrew Glincher.
The strong gains in 2018's revenue came alongside sizable bumps in the firm's net income, which rose 33 percent to $196.9 million. Profits per equity partner (PEP) were also buoyed. The average Nixon Peabody equity partner earned more than $1.5 million in profits in 2018, some 35.2 percent more than the $1.11 million PEP figure the firm reported in 2017.
Those PEP changes coincided with a slight decrease in the firm's equity partnership, which shrunk to 131 in 2018 from the 133 equity partners the firm had in 2017. The dip in equity partner head count was offset by an increase of 3 non-equity partners; non-equity compensation at Nixon Peabody totaled $60.88 million in 2017.
Overall, the firm's head count grew slightly in 2018, increasing from 602 lawyers to 607 lawyers. Nixon Peabody made four lateral partner hires across various U.S. offices in 2018—adding real estate lawyer David Allswang in Chicago, labor and employment lawyer Benjamin Kim in Los Angeles, public finance lawyer Roderick Devlin in New York and corporate lawyer Lior Zorea in San Francisco.
The firm kept those lawyers busy with a range of transactional and litigation work. On the deals side, which Glincher said was particularly strong in 2018, Nixon Peabody represented alcohol maker Constellation Brands Inc. in connection with a $4 billion investment in Canadian medical marijuana company Canopy Growth Corp.
The firm also had a role advising payroll processing company Paychex Inc. in a $1.2 billion acquisition of human resources services company Oasis Outsourcing Acquisition Corp. Nixon Peabody's public finance group, which lateral hire Devlin joined, represented New York's Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority in connection with a municipal bond issuance.
“Our transactional practice has been through the roof,” said Glincher, explaining that beyond the major deals over a billion dollars, the firm also had an active year in smaller, mid-market transactions.
On the litigation side, highlights included a defense win for Daher-Socata Aerospace after a three-week trial in a widely publicized $15 million negligence lawsuit against the French aircraft manufacturer. The firm also found success in contingency fee litigation, which Glincher said is a recurring but relatively minor part of the firm's business. Such cases typically amount to about 1 percent of the firm's revenue; in 2018, the firm earned about $20 million from contingency cases compared with the total gross revenue of $530.6 million.
Beyond the firm's work efforts and financial results, Glincher said diversity was another key focus for Nixon Peabody over the past year. Some 60 percent of the firm's new partner class for 2019 come from diverse backgrounds, and in 2018 the firm became certified under the Mansfield Rule. The rule specifies that at least 30 percent of the candidate pool for leadership or governance positions at a law firm are comprised of women and minorities.
Glincher said the firm's focus on diversity, as well as a commitment to promoting health and well-being among Nixon Peabody lawyers and employees, all serve to make the firm a dynamic and attractive workplace. That sort of focus, Glincher added, helps draw in the kind of top legal talent that Nixon Peabody looks for, especially amid an environment in which “the competition for great talent is as great as the competition for great clients.”
“It just makes us a much better organization,” he said “All of these things have made for a very dynamic environment.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250