Thompson & Knight Posts Big Profit Gains in 2018
Profits per equity partner at Dallas-based Thompson & Knight jumped 15.9 percent in 2018 compared with 2017.
February 13, 2019 at 03:48 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
A busy year across practices helped Thompson & Knight improve its gross revenue by 6.8 percent in 2018, and boost profits per equity partner by a hefty 15.9 percent.
The Dallas-based firm's gross revenue came in at $226.49 million, up from $212.02 million in 2017, and revenue per lawyer hit $802,000, up 5.8 percent from $758,000 in 2017.
Net income was $95.28 million, up 2.7 percent from $92.75 million the year before, and PEP topped the million-dollar mark at $1.11 million, up from $956,000 in 2017.
“It was a busy year all the way around,” managing partner Mark Sloan said, highlighting the energy, private equity and corporate practices as very busy throughout the year.
“We closed about $16 billion in M&A and $10.6 billion in private equity and capital markets deals,” Sloan added.
He said the strong deal flow drove work into other practices, including tax, finance, and oil and gas. Real estate posted another strong year, Sloan said, and intellectual property litigation was the busiest it has been in several years. The trial practice also stayed busy, Sloan said.
The countercyclical bankruptcy practice was the only major down area, Sloan said.
Anticipating a heavy workload, Sloan said the firm made a concerted effort to build up its associate bench strength in 2018, and ended the year with 10 more associates than it had on Jan. 1. As for the expense of higher associate pay during the second half of the year—the firm bumped it's starting salary for first-years to the $190,000 market rate—Sloan said Thompson & Knight had budgeted some money for associate raises just in case.
The firm's total lawyer count was flat, and its equity tier shrank, with a full-time-equivalent of 86 equity partners, down from 97 the year before. Sloan noted that some lawyers defected to other firms early in the year, but a few lawyers also retired or scaled back their practices, leaving the partnership.
Thompson & Knight worked on a new strategic plan in 2018, and very recently rolled it out to the partners, Sloan said.
“It was high time we did one and I think people are excited about it,” he said. “We keyed in on things we are prioritizing as a firm for growth and areas we want to pay attention to, like growth in talent, and business development and marketing.”
The firm's goals include recruitment and retention of “quality” talent, a focus on profitability and providing value for clients, and marketing and business development, he said. As for growth, Sloan said, the top priorities are the Houston and New York offices.
“When you consider all the competition coming into the marketplace, I'm really excited about the future,” Sloan said, adding that the firm's new chief operating officer, Keith Whitman, will focus on the strategic plan.
“He came in at the right time,” Sloan said.
Whitman, who spent five years at Kobre & Kim in New York, said Thompson & Knight is “ready to write the next chapter in the firm's history.” In addition to advancing the firm's strategic initiatives, he said, he plans to focus on branding, as well as developing more customized pricing models for various clients.
Sloan said it's too early in the year to predict how 2019 will turn out, but he said activity has picked up dramatically the last two or three weeks.
|Further Reading:
Thompson & Knight Saw Net Income Improve, Gross Revenue Slip in 2017
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readA&O Shearman Power Regulatory Partner Jumps to Hogan Lovells 3 Months Post-Merger
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250