Troutman Sanders Hires Ex-Wisconsin Solicitor General Known for EPA Challenges
Misha Tseytlin was the first and last Wisconsin solicitor general. Now, he's trying to build a Supreme Court practice at Troutman Sanders.
February 15, 2019 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
Misha Tseytlin, former Wisconsin solicitor general, wants to build at Troutman Sanders what he formed for the state of Wisconsin: A team of successful appellate lawyers. And he sees plenty of demand for it.
While Tseytlin often challenged Obama-era environmental regulations, he said there is still work to do in that arena as President Donald Trump pursues a much more business-friendly environmental policy.
“Who is on what side of the 'v,' or who is in opposition or support of the EPA changes, but there is plenty of litigation to go around,” Tseytlin said in an interview. “In addition, when you see federal regulation become more business-friendly, states will litigate more.”
Tseytlin held the position of Wisconsin solicitor general from its creation in 2015 up until it was abolished late last year via a package of controversial laws signed during the last days of ex-Gov. Scott Walker's term. For the moment, Tseytlin holds the distinction of being the first and last Wisconsin solicitor general.
Troutman Sanders announced this week it hired Tseytlin in its Chicago office as head of the Am Law 100 firm's appellate and U.S. Supreme Court practice. The Atlanta-based firm's Supreme Court practice also includes Christopher Browning, who is a former solicitor general for North Carolina, and William Hurd, a former solicitor general of Virginia.
Tseytlin, a former clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, said he was proud of the work he did on behalf of the state of Wisconsin, which included appearing in front of the U.S. Supreme Court twice and taking leading roles in challenging Obama-era Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
“One of the most gratifying things for me in that position was being able to build something,” Tseytlin said. “That's one of the reasons I'm so excited to be heading to Troutman Sanders.”
Tseytlin declined to comment on the abolishment of his former office. He said he is representing the Wisconsin legislature in relation to a challenge of the laws enacted by Walker that scrapped the solicitor general's office.
While cracking into the small and hypercompetitive Supreme Court bar can be difficult, Tseytlin said, “There is plenty of room for new attorneys, especially people who have experience before the U.S. Supreme Court, such as myself.”
Tseytlin argued Gill v. Whitford, a challenge to Wisconsin's political redistricting plan, before the high court in 2017. Last year, the court ruled 9-0 in favor of the state's plan, finding the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case. Tsteytlin also argued Murr v. Wisconsin, a property rights case that the justices ruled in favor of Wisconsin, 5-3.
Tseytlin worked on a number of challenges to environmental regulations, including the Clean Power Plan, which some 24 states challenged and was stayed in 2016 by a Supreme Court ruling. Those environmental challenges are when he crossed paths with Troutman Sanders lawyers who represented industry clients also challenging those regulations or drafting amicus briefs.
Tseytlin has already filed at least one amicus brief with the Supreme Court as a Troutman Sanders lawyer. This month, he filed a brief in Rucho v. Common Cause, another redistricting case, on behalf of the North Carolina members of the U.S. House of Representatives. He urged the justices to overturn a district court decision that struck down the state's 2016 congressional map.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250