Best Best & Krieger Reports Strong Revenue Growth
The firm, which specializes in the representation of governments and public agencies, prospered in FY 2018.
February 22, 2019 at 04:59 PM
3 minute read
|
Best Best & Krieger (BB&K), a California-based law firm specializing in work for cities, counties, districts, and other public agencies, posted significant growth in revenue, profits, and lawyer head count in FY 2018 compared with the year before.
Gross revenue reached $91.5 million, an 8.9 percent increase over 2017's figure of $84 million. Revenue per lawyer climbed from $451,000 to $454,000, a 0.7 percent gain. Profits per equity partner rose from $393,000 to $398,000, a 1.3 percent increase.
All this growth occurred as the firm increased its lawyer head count. The total number of lawyers at the firm rose from 186 to 202. The new hires include eight attorneys who were previously with the boutique Manhattan Beach law firm Jenkins & Hogin. BB&K also gained three health care-focused attorneys when the California law firm Archer Norris closed its doors and filed for bankruptcy.
While the number of equity partners at Best was constant at 56, the law firm gained six nonequity partners, for a total of 47.
Eric Garner, managing partner of the firm, attributes the strong figures partly to a post-downturn economy offering plentiful opportunities to serve municipal and other public clients in California and beyond.
“The growth has been organic, building on public agency demand and, to some extent, private business demand. There aren't too many law firms that do this type of work,” Garner said. “The primary competition is much smaller boutique firms. We have a greater breadth.”
Apart from its merger with the much smaller firm of Jenkins & Hogin, BB&K has not engaged in merger talks in the last few years, Garner said. Public agency work is, ultimately, a lower-rate type of legal service compared to the kinds of work for which Am Law 100 firms tend to bill $1,000 or $1,500 an hour, and a law firm specializing in public agency representations simply might not make enough money for some potential merger partners, Garner acknowledged.
In 2019 and beyond, the law firm aims to expand existing practice areas through lateral hires, but not at such a rate that the assimilation of lawyers into the firm's distinct culture will be sacrificed, Garner said.
“We have some conversations going on, and we hope there will be some further growth this year, but we don't want to grow too fast,” he said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250