Snell & Wilmer Reports Increase in Revenue, Profits
The mid-market law firm made modest gains with affordable services
February 22, 2019 at 03:50 PM
2 minute read
|
Mid-market law firm Snell & Wilmer has reported modest financial growth in fiscal year 2018, driven by affordable legal services in offices throughout the western United States.
The firm's gross revenue in the past fiscal year edged up slightly to $262 million, up from the $260 million reported last year. Profits per equity partner increased 7.5 percent to $860,000 from $800,000, a gain partly attributable to the fact that two of the firm's 87 equity partners left, resulting in slightly more work and profits to distribute among the remaining 85.
A Snell & Wilmer representative attributed the modest financial gains to the firm's presence throughout the western U.S. The firm has offices in Salt Lake City, Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Orange County, Reno, Boise, Albuquerque, Tuscon, and Phoenix, in addition to Washington, D.C., Snell & Wilmer has one office in Mexico.
“We do work all over the country, but our cost structure is significantly lower than those of our peer firms. That has allowed us to take on and make money on work that some firms can't touch,” the representative said.
Snell & Wilmer's rates rose just over 2 percent in the last fiscal year. The firm recently hired a pricing director, James Omerza, to deploy sophisticated pricing tools and work with clients on fee arrangements, including alternative fee structures where appropriate.
Although Snell & Wilmer's bankruptcy practice was not quite as busy in fiscal year 2018 as in past years, the firm reports growing deal flow in such practice areas as commercial finance, labor and employment, real estate, tax and commercial litigation.
“Our commercial finance group and our bankruptcy group are looking to grow further in 2019. We all know that a downturn is coming, and these practice groups have plenty to do in a downturn. We know it's coming; we just don't know precisely when,” the firm representative said.
Snell & Wilmer's reported gross revenue stems solely from legal work and does not include any revenue from nonlegal subsidiaries. The law firm says it has not taken part in merger talks within the last couple of years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250