Hinshaw's New Chairman Seeks to Reverse Head Count, Revenue Declines
Peter Sullivan, Hinshaw's new leader, wants to grow the firm in more practice areas and cities, after three years of revenue and head count declines.
February 25, 2019 at 04:19 PM
5 minute read
Hinshaw & Culbertson on Friday named Chicago-based Peter Sullivan as the firm's third chairman in the past 30 years. The 60-year-old litigation partner and Hinshaw lifer has a goal to return the firm to head count and revenue growth after three straight years of declines.
Revenue at the Chicago-founded firm in 2018 fell 4 percent from the prior year to $208.5 million, according to preliminary data from ALM. That marks a roughly 7.3 percent decline since the firm's revenue peaked at $225 million in 2015. The firm's head count also reached a high that year of 497 lawyers, and last year fell to 423 lawyers, according to ALM Intelligence data.
The firm's full-time equivalent (FTE) lawyer head count has declined nearly 15 percent during that three-year stretch, which is roughly twice the rate of its revenue declines. As a result, the firm's revenue per lawyer has increased. Revenue per lawyer at the firm last year was $493,000, a 2.9 percent rise from the prior year and an 8.4 percent increase from 2015. Profits per equity partner last year fell nearly 6 percent to $482,000, according to ALM Intelligence.
Sullivan said the declines in head count were partially a management response to overcapacity as well as some lateral departures to competitive firms.
“We think we can get that back,” Sullivan said. “We think Hinshaw is a great firm with a great reputation, great practice areas and great clients. And we think we can get back to 450, 500 lawyers, and that will certainly be one of the focuses of my chairmanship: to grow the firm and get that FTE back up over time. That is certainly a key focus.”
The firm's leadership change, Sullivan said, was driven by a decision by the former chairman, Kevin Burke, to return to his litigation practice. Burke, who had said in 2016 that he was shaping the firm to compete in four main practice areas, will remain in a leadership role that the firm said will be focused on “strategic relationships and innovation efforts.”
In particular, Burke's goal will be to deepen the firm's understanding of how the legal market is changing and help the firm respond to it, the firm said in a release.
“While our lawyers focus on the here-and-now of the challenges facing the firm's clients,” Burke said in a statement, “Peter and I are committed to making sure Hinshaw is also a law firm of the future, at the leading edge of delivering the legal services our clients require to achieve success in the next decade and beyond.”
Sullivan joined Hinshaw in 1983 as an associate, one year before Burke, another Hinshaw lifer. Before Burke's four-year stint as chairman, Hinshaw was led for 26 years by Don Mrozek.
Burke, who was voted firm chairman in 2014, took the title in 2015, following a year transition period. Sullivan's transition to chairman took less time. The firm's executive committee (comprised of more than 20 partners) voted unanimously within the last two weeks to nominate Sullivan as a candidate for chairman, he said. A broader partnership vote followed on Thursday, Sullivan said.
While Sullivan will seek to grow the firm's head count, he said the firm was not as focused on limiting that growth to the practice areas Burke had favored, representing insurance companies; lawyers and professionals facing malpractice claims; consumer businesses; and handling business litigation.
Sullivan said the firm was also focused on growth in representing midmarket business and its tort defense practice, and the firm would seek to grow in cities such as Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and South Florida.
“That doesn't mean I don't want to grow the other offices,” Sullivan said. “There's a lot more legal work in the major metropolitan areas. So logically focusing on those would be wise for the firm.”
In addition, Sullivan said he will focus the firm's efforts on adopting technology to become more efficient and to further developing its knowledge management capabilities. The firm in 2017 hired Vishal Agnihotri as its first chief knowledge officer. Sullivan said Agnihotri has been building a database that allows the firm's lawyers to search and retrieve work product from similar matters.
“Our lawyers need to know how to use [that system], they need to know it exists, and they need to use it,” Sullivan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250