Frost Brown Todd's Revenues and Profits Slip in FY2018
The firm saw declines in profits per equity partner as the number of equity partners remained flat and its overall head count rose 3.5 percent.
February 27, 2019 at 05:16 PM
3 minute read
Mid-market law firm Frost Brown Todd has reported a drop in revenue and profits in FY2018 compared to the year before.
Gross revenue declined 1.4 percent, from $223.6 million in FY2017 to $220.4 million in FY2018. Revenue per lawyer fell 3.4 percent, from $503,000 to $486,000 over the same period, while profits per equity partner dropped from $501,000, to $453,000—a decline of 9.6 percent.
The number of equity partners remained the same at 159, but the number of nonequity partners increased from 141 to 146. And the total number of lawyers at the firm rose from 445 to 453—a 3.5 percent jump.
Robert Sartin, the firm's chair, said the profit decline stemmed partly from the need to make certain internal investments at the firm and he sees it as a temporary drop. The on-boarding of new members and associates is a lengthy process, he said.
“It takes somebody a good 30-45 days to get onto the platform, get files cleared, and start working. The revenue replacement doesn't show up until after they're on-boarded,” Sartin said.
The firm also made further investments over the past year.
“We took some of our profits and put them into testing various types of AI and other things we're going to need to be more competitive in the marketplace,” Sartin said.
In addition, the firm took on a number of transactions in 2018 that didn't close by the end of the fiscal year, Sartin said, so the profits from those deals are not reflected in the reported totals, even though they are significant and profitable engagements for the firm.
One of the law firm's mainstays, its commercial litigation practice, did not underperform in 2018, Sartin said. Rather, a number of cases that could have gone to trial instead settled out of court.
“On the transactional side, the financial services, syndicated lending, commercial banking, and CMBS practices of our law firm performed very well,” Sartin said.
Looking to the future, Frost Brown's leadership has also been in planning mode, Sartin said.
“We have been working on a strategic plan that charts the course of the next five to ten years for the law firm. To develop a plan takes some billable hours off the table, and those become internal investment hours,” Sartin stated.
That strategic planning has not included merger talks, but Sartin said the firm will evaluate all opportunities.
“As a part of our strategic plan, we'll evaluate all opportunities to grow, to make us a better law firm. If that might lead to a combination, then, like any business, of course we'll take a look at it,” Sartin said. “We're not looking to expand geographically for its own sake, but we will probably enter new markets so that we can better serve our clients.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 2Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 3Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 4New Associates Yearbook 2024
- 5Disbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250