Partner Profits Pass $1M at Duane Morris as Growth Streak Continues
Gross revenue at the Philadelphia-based firm was up 5.5 percent, as profits per equity partner passed the $1 million mark for the first time.
February 27, 2019 at 11:31 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Duane Morris saw revenue and profits grow in 2018, as the firm surpassed the $1 million mark in profits per equity partner for the first time.
Gross revenue at the Philadelphia-based firm was up 5.5 percent, reaching $491.6 million in 2018, compared with $466 million in 2017. Revenue per lawyer was up 3.7 percent, increasing from $706,000 in 2017 to $732,000 in 2018, as head count grew slightly.
PEP increased by 4.8 percent, from $964,000 in 2017 to $1.01 million in 2018. Net income grew by 8.8 percent, to $127.45 million.
Nearly three-quarters of Am Law 100 firms had PEP of $1 million or more in 2017. But among firms that were founded in Pennsylvania, only three were in that club last year: Dechert; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; and Reed Smith.
“We didn't back into that number by de-equitizing partners. We did it our way, just by being disciplined,” firm chairman Matthew Taylor said.
Taylor, who became the chairman at the beginning of 2018, said it was the 10th straight year of growth for Duane Morris, and it was important to him to continue that pattern in his first year leading the firm.
“We're seeing the strength and power of our platform,” he said, adding that 28 percent of revenue came from “cross-office, cross-practice group” engagements.
Looking at the firm's international offices, he said, London is “in a very steady state,” and had one of its best years in 2018. The Asian offices, Taylor said, grew revenue by about 10 percent last year, as Singapore and Vietnam had particularly strong performances.
Both the trial group and corporate practices were strong in 2018, Taylor said, noting a few significant matters. And no practices were particularly weak, he said, noting that bankruptcy and reorganization work began to pick up in the second half of the year.
On the litigation side, the firm is representing Otto Bock HealthCare in an ongoing matter before the Federal Trade Commission regarding the company's acquisition of FIH Group Holdings, which makes prosthetics. And it represented Dicerna Pharmaceuticals in a trade secrets case that settled in April.
Taylor also highlighted a couple of large corporate matters the firm handled, including a $2.5 billion credit facility for Quanta Services, and a $950 million credit facility for Diamond Offshore Drilling.
In terms of head count, the firm changed little from 2017 to 2018. Total head count was up 1.7 percent, to 671 lawyers. The partnership as a whole was almost identical in size, but the firm added a net four equity partners, reaching 126 total, while the number of nonequity partners decreased by six, to 220.
The firm brought on several groups of lawyers across the country throughout the year. They included seven IP attorneys from Vedder Price in May, a corporate insurance partner and IP partner who joined the firm's young Austin office in January, and a pair of litigation partners in California from now-shuttered Sedgwick. In Philadelphia, the firm added a health care lawyer who came from an in-house position at health system Ascension.
But the firm also lost an eight-lawyer IP team that joined California firm Rimon in September, as well as litigation partner Miguel Pozo, a onetime in-house lawyer for Mercedes-Benz.
|Bullish but Conservative
Taylor said Duane Morris raised rates by about 3.5 percent.
Alternative fee arrangements have become more popular each year, he noted. The firm has a dedicated group of pricing analysts on its finance and accounting team, Taylor said, to respond quickly when clients or prospective clients are looking for an idea of how much a particular matter will cost at Duane Morris.
“We're becoming better project managers,” Taylor said. “Realization rates have gotten higher and higher because of good project management.”
As for its own budget, he said, Duane Morris is typically conservative in spending, and that held true in 2018, but the firm did not make any additional cuts in 2018 to increase profits. On the contrary, the firm grew its marketing and business development budget and spent more on technology, he said.
When a wave of associate salary increases hit the market, Duane Morris was “measured and responsive,” Taylor said. The firm is currently working on finalizing changes to its associate compensation structure, he said, and while it was watching the trends over the summer, it did not make a move immediately.
In the year ahead, Taylor said, Duane Morris will aim to continue growth in the markets where it already has a presence. It may look to open in Dallas, he said, which would be a testament to the firm's successful growth in Houston and Austin in recent years. The firm will also look to grow in Northern California, he said.
Still, he said, the firm has no debt, and will continue that way. While the firm remains optimistic about its growth trajectory, he said, it will not be caught off guard if the economy takes a turn.
“We're bullish, but we always set a conservative budget,” Taylor said. “We're always prepared to be nimble.”
|Read More:
Duane Morris Adds Trial Lawyer Trio in Austin, IP Partner in London
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250